The Infernal Machine

by Jean Cocteau

Start Free Trial

Political and Social Commentary

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Jean Cocteau’s "The Infernal Machine" deftly intertwines political and social commentary within the fabric of mythological narrative, offering a sharp critique of the societal issues plaguing France during the 1930s. Through the play, Cocteau reveals the latent political and social dilemmas inherent in mythological tales, drawing parallels to contemporary concerns about national security, economic instability, and social unrest. These concerns echo the turbulent climate of both international and domestic affairs faced by France at the time.

In Cocteau’s dramatization, the characters embody the apathetic populace, reflecting a society caught in the throes of indifference. Ordinary individuals, characterized by limited intellect and mundane preoccupations, appear powerless to alter the course of events. Even when presented with opportunities to effect change, they remain passive. A poignant example is the soldiers who choose not to relay Laius’s final warning. Although the warning is incomplete, it possesses the potential to inform Jocasta of impending danger. Yet, these soldiers prioritize concerns of status and bureaucratic entanglements over pressing national issues.

Among the characters, a mother engages in conversation with the Sphinx, embodying ignorance and gossip. Nevertheless, her critique of the Theban government as corrupt and incompetent resonates with chilling realism. She suggests that the government is complicit in sustaining the threat posed by the Sphinx, using it as a convenient distraction from the failures of domestic policies. This scenario mirrors the perception of the weakened French governments in the early 1930s, grappling with similar accusations.

The mother’s conclusion, that only a dictator could effectively govern the nation, captures a sentiment prevalent in France during that era. This notion, however, was contrary to Cocteau’s beliefs. By presenting these ideas through a character distanced from his own worldview, Cocteau subtly critiques such authoritarian inclinations, underscoring his disapproval of the rise in dictatorial sentiment during the period.

Fate and Predestination

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

In the narrative of fate and predestination, those who wield power often exhibit a profound insensitivity, as exemplified by Jocasta in the first act. This portrayal implicitly criticizes the indifference of governments towards immediate interventions that could ameliorate the plight of ordinary citizens. Instead of focusing on short-term relief, there is an overreliance on long-term policies, which seem futile in the face of an unpredictable future. Attempts to foresee what lies ahead, such as consulting oracles, often end in confusion and despair, yielding no beneficial outcomes.

The myth of Oedipus illustrates the futility of trying to evade destiny. The Sphinx, in an attempt to interfere with divine will by sparing Oedipus, unwittingly propels him towards his unavoidable fate. Jocasta and Oedipus themselves endeavor in vain to escape their predestined paths, only to find themselves ensnared by them. Their experiences underscore a compelling argument against delving into the past; Oedipus's obsessive quest to unveil the source of the plague and the truth behind the Corinthian message only hastens the impending disaster.

Jean Cocteau's understanding of his contemporaries emerges vividly in this context. His narrative echoes the dark period in French history during the Philippe Pétain era, where there was a notorious propensity to find scapegoats—not merely for the military defeat in 1940, but for the perceived moral degradation afflicting the nation. Through Oedipus, Cocteau draws a parallel to the dangers of such scapegoating, suggesting that the true calamity lies not in the fated events but in the moral failures of society.

Playwright's Control and Theatrical Experience

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

In the realm of theater, the playwright wields unparalleled authority over the unfolding drama, a concept vividly illustrated by Cocteau in his work. Drawing a parallel to ancient myths, where divine entities toy with human destinies, Cocteau parallels this with the control a playwright has...

(This entire section contains 214 words.)

Unlock this Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

over their characters. Much like mythological figures who are at the mercy of the gods, characters on stage find themselves bound by the script, unable to deviate from their destined paths.

Cocteau skillfully embeds subtle foreshadowing into the dialogue of Jocasta and Oedipus, crafting lines that unknowingly allude to the revelations and tragedies that lie ahead. This manipulation highlights the playwright’s intent and foresight, akin to the mythical gods who devised intricate plans for mortals. The very title of the play, The Infernal Machine, encapsulates this duality, symbolizing both the contraption devised by deities to destroy a human and the structured, inexorable nature of a theatrical performance.

The experience crafted by Cocteau serves as a reflection on the deterministic nature of theater, where every line and action is predestined, mirroring the ancient narratives where humans were mere pawns in a divine game. The audience, much like the characters, is drawn into this intricately woven narrative, compelled to witness the inevitable unfolding of fate devised by the playwright's hand.

Next

Characters

Loading...