Illustration of Jack Worthing in a top hat and formal attire, and a concerned expression on his face

The Importance of Being Earnest

by Oscar Wilde

Start Free Trial

Critical Overview

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Oscar Wilde's "The Importance of Being Earnest" is often hailed as a masterful satire of Victorian society, marked by its wit and humor. Wilde's play critiques the era's values, particularly in its mockery of earnestness—a quality the Victorians held in high regard. Despite its enduring popularity, the play has sparked debates over its moral and structural elements.

Mocking Victorian Values

Wilde, a prominent figure in the Yellow Nineties, used his works to lampoon the hypocrisy and superficiality of the era. "The Importance of Being Earnest" stands as a pivotal example, cleverly turning its title into a commentary on the virtue of earnestness. The play exposes the duality of its characters, who live double lives and embody the societal contradictions Wilde sought to criticize.

Wilde's Personal and Public Scandal

Wilde’s personal life became embroiled in scandal shortly after the play's debut, as his openness about his sexuality led to legal troubles in a society that criminalized homosexual acts. His public downfall added another layer to the play’s theme of concealed truths, as the playwright who deftly unveiled societal secrets found himself exposed. This personal narrative of duality parallels the themes in "Earnest," where characters navigate the tension between societal expectations and individual desires.

The Play's Intellectual Appeal

The characters in "The Importance of Being Earnest" exhibit a sparkling intellectual charm, even as they reveal the shallow, frivolous nature of their social circles. They embody a paradox of earnestness and deception, offering a critique of a society that values decorum over sincerity. Wilde's humor relies heavily on language, with dialogues that require the audience to question whether the characters are consciously or unconsciously voicing deeper truths.

Criticism and Genre Debate

Critics have long debated the play’s moral stance and its categorization within theatrical genres. Playwright George Bernard Shaw criticized its perceived amorality, while others, like Edouard Roditi, argued it lacked a strong ethical viewpoint. Critics like Eric Bentley and Otto Reinert, however, saw Wilde’s work as a reflection of Victorian hypocrisy, with the characters' "bunburying" highlighting the moral significance of their actions.

The structural classification of "Earnest" has also been contested. While some view it as a farce, using exaggerated situations and characters, others, such as Richard Foster, argue that its true strength lies in its dialogue and satirical edge rather than mere slapstick comedy. The play cleverly utilizes familiar tropes to critique societal norms, transforming them into a parody of Victorian ideals.

Parody and Satire

Wilde’s play transcends simple comedy by embedding parody within its structure, using recognizable plot devices to satirize Victorian society. The narrative weaves through themes of mistaken identity and societal conventions, using them to highlight the absurdities of the time. The play's resolution, though seemingly contrived, serves as a deliberate critique of social norms, ultimately embracing the paradoxes it so skillfully exposes.

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Next

Essays and Criticism

Loading...