Michael Billington
Through such plays as Revenge and Christie in Love, Howard Brenton has quickly won himself a reputation as one of our most strikingly original young dramatists. However, this new piece [Fruit] … is so shrill, hysterical and uncoordinated, that it makes one wonder where precisely Mr. Brenton's acknowledged love of excess is leading him.
Admittedly it bears all his familiar trademarks: the relish for grotesque physical detail, the fascination with the corrupting effect of power, the love of theatrical shock tactics. But whereas before his obsession with the narrow dividing line between the policeman and his prey has helped to focus all his dramatic energies, he here seems to be flailing wildly about in all directions…. [There] is no dramatic law that says playwrights who preach anarchy themselves have to practise it; and Mr. Brenton gravely weakens a perfectly tenable viewpoint by failing to give the separate scenes an organic relationship and by repeatedly turning to violence as a device for raising the theatrical temperature.
If one is severe with Mr. Brenton, it is because he has so much exuberant natural talent; but here, in spite of the nervy vitality of David Hare's production, one feels that talent is wildly misdirected.
Michael Billington, in a review of "Fruit," in The Times, London, September 30, 1970, p. 13.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.