Chapters 12–14 Summary
Chapter 12: Class
Kendi begins this chapter’s discussion on the intersection of race, class, poverty, and capitalism by defining class racist—“one who is racializing the classes, supporting policies of racial capitalism against those race-classes, and justifying them by racist ideas about those race-classes”—and antiracist anticapitalist—“one who is opposing racial capitalism.”
After graduating from FAMU, Kendi moved to Philadelphia to attend Temple University. Upon his arrival, he was warned by well-intentioned neighbors that his new neighborhood was the “ghetto.” The newly-minted graduate student was unbothered by these warnings. Instead, he felt exhilarated by what he considered Black authenticity. As he remembers,
I considered poor Blacks to be the truest and most authentic representatives of Black people. I made urban poverty an entryway into the supposedly crime-riddled and impoverished house of authentic Blackness.
In the present day, Kendi recognizes the inherent racism underlying this perception. The term “ghetto” itself, he notes, has come to obscure the racist policy underlying the concentration of poor Blacks in one area. Instead, the term criminalizes those who live there by encapsulating so-called “unrespectable Black behavior.”
Citing examples of mass incarceration, wide statistical wealth gaps, and cyclical poverty, Kendi positions capitalism as one of the driving forces behind racist policy and racial inequity in modern society, and he argues that support of capitalism is equivalent to support of racism:
The conjoined twins are two sides of the same destructive body.
Taking care to illustrate the extent to which capitalism and racism are intertwined without conflating one for the other, Kendi cautions the reader that anticapitalism is not automatically antiracist. The only way to dismantle class racism is to embrace and support both anticapitalism and antiracism simultaneously.
Chapter 13: Space
To preface his discussion on the racial dynamics of physical space, Kendi defines two terms. Space racism, as he defines it, is
a powerful collection of racist policies that lead to resource inequity between racialized spaces or the elimination of certain racialized spaces, which are substantiated by racist ideas about racialized spaces.
Space antiracism, conversely, is
a powerful collection of antiracist policies that lead to racial equity between integrated and protected racialized spaces, which are substantiated by antiracist ideas about racialized spaces.
Recalling his time at Temple University, Kendi remembers the feeling of occupying a demonstrably Black space—the African American studies department—within the broader white space of the university. It was, he writes, clearly defined in a way that the university’s many white spaces were not—a benefit of perceived “neutrality” that, by nature of racism, typically extends only to the white community. In the case of Temple University, this spatial delineation was especially necessary. The university itself is a predominantly white space occupying two imposing buildings in majority-Black North Philadelphia. To protect the Black space nested within it was to preserve the very nature of the university’s environment.
Kendi contextualizes his own space-making experience with an inquiry into two kinds of historic separation of educational spaces: those instituted by racist white segregationists, and those organically created by voluntary gathering of Black people away from white spaces. The distinction between them is crucial to understanding space racism; while white segregationist policies are designed to place limitations on Black people by sequestering them away, voluntary separation is something different and needs to be viewed from a different perspective. “Whenever Black people voluntarily gather among themselves,” the author explains, “integrationists do not see spaces of Black solidarity created to separate Black people from racism. . . . Integrationists do not see these spaces as the movement of Black people toward Black people.”
To be spatially antiracist, Kendi...
(This entire section contains 828 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
contends, requires challenging the racist policies that drive unequal resource distribution across racialized spaces—not the condemnation of spaces where groups voluntarily gather in solidarity away from racism.
Chapter 14: Gender
In the epigraph to chapter 14, Kendi defines gender racism as “a powerful collection of racist policies that lead to inequity between race-genders and are substantiated by racist ideas about race-genders” and gender antiracism as “a powerful collection of antiracist policies that lead to equity between race-genders and are substantiated by antiracist ideas about race-genders.”
“I arrived at Temple as a racist, sexist homophobe,” Kendi admits. This wasn’t a function of intent, he clarifies, but a function of the omission of certain narratives during his formative years and an upbringing in a home that did not prioritize raising their sons not to be those things:
My parents did not strictly raise me to be a Black patriarch. I became a Black patriarch because my parents did not strictly raise me to be a Black feminist.
Through his friendships with Black feminists at Temple, Kendi ultimately came to recognize and outgrow these prejudices. He also came to understand the constant battles Black feminists must fight within their own movements. In feminist spaces, they fight constant racism; in Black spaces, they fight constant sexism. To be gender antiracist, Kendi contends, is to recognize and fight to dismantle both prejudices simultaneously.