Critical Overview

Download PDF Print Page Citation Share Link

When The Homecoming opened in London on June 3, 1965, Harold Pinter was already considered a major playwright m England, and his new play was eagerly awaited. Harold Hobson, critic for the Sunday Times, who alone had championed Pinter's debut The Room and his 1958 The Birthday Party, had said then that "Mr. Pinter ... possesses the most original, disturbing and arresting talent in theatrical London," and he predicted then that Pinter would make his mark in theatre. The great success of The Caretaker in 1960, radio plays such as A Slight Ache, and short stage and television plays had fulfilled Hobson's predictions, and the word "Pinteresque" had already been coined to denote the playwright's style.

Illustration of PDF document

Download The Homecoming Study Guide

Subscribe Now

The Homecoming is a deeply disturbing play and the critics' reception reflected the drama's turmoil. B. A. Young of the Financial Times called the play "stark and horrible'' but also said that it is "monstrously effective theatre." Although Young did not think Pinter to be an important playwright, he pointed out that "he has this enormous capacity for generating tension among his characters in which the audience becomes irresistibly involved." Bernard Levin in the Daily Mail, while crediting Pinter's "dazzling dramatic legerdemain," was negative and saw no point to the play. Philip Hope-Wallace of the Guardian objected strongly (and longly) about the lack of dramatic irony—in which the audience knows more than the characters on stage— and the fact that it was the actors (characters?) who seemed to know more than the audience. The critic seemed to be completely baffled by the play and said that it "leaves us feeling cheated.''

Hobson wrote in the Sunday Times that he liked the play but was deeply disturbed by the lack of a moral stand by the author, saying "I am troubled by the complete absence from the play of any moral comment whatsoever. To make such a comment does not necessitate the author's being conventional or religious; it does necessitate, however, his having made up his mind about life." Penelope Gilhatt in the Observer called the opening of The Homecoming "an exultant night ... it offered the stirring spectacle of a man in total command of his talent."

British audiences responded positively and the play had an eighteen-month run at the Aldwych Theatre in London before moving to New York on January 3, 1967, after a brief pre-Broadway run in Boston. It also quickly had other productions around the world: Paris, Berlin, Geneva, Gothenburg, Munich, Bremerhaven, Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Helsinki, Stockholm, and Sydney, Australia.

The Broadway reviews were mixed but predominantly positive. Norman Nadel in the World Journal Tribune called it a "nightmare play'' and a "fascinating but unfathomable comedy" and thought it would appeal only to more adventurous theatre-goers. Martin Gottfried, the powerful critic of Women's Wear Daily , found it "a fascinating and bizarre comedy" that "is so deep-veined with implication and so consistently provocative, controlling and comic that it not only demands respect but, more important, it wins...

(The entire section contains 759 words.)

Unlock This Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this The Homecoming study guide. You'll get access to all of the The Homecoming content, as well as access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

  • Summary
  • Themes
  • Characters
  • Critical Essays
  • Analysis
  • Teaching Guide
Start your 48-Hour Free Trial

Critical Context


Essays and Criticism