Student Question

Why were the Articles of Confederation considered a failure?

Quick answer:

The Articles of Confederation were considered a failure because they created a weak national government that lacked authority over the states. This led to issues like trade disputes between states, inability to levy taxes, and failure to maintain a standing army, hindering responses to foreign threats and domestic uprisings like Shays' Rebellion. The lack of a central judicial system further complicated interstate disputes, highlighting the need for a stronger federal government, which eventually led to the drafting of the U.S. Constitution.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

There are at least two ways to read this question.

First, it could be asking us what events showed that the Articles of Confederation were a failure.  One answer is that numerous trade disputes between states showed that the Articles were a failure.  The various states acted more like independent countries than like parts of the same country, trying to hinder trade across state lines.  This reduced the size and the potential of the US economy.  Another event was when Congress tried to impose a tariff in 1781.  This was supposed to help stem the flow of British imports and help American producers.  It was also supposed to pressure the British to stop restricting American trade with British colonies in the West Indies.  However, the Congress had to ask the states for permission to do this and the states had to vote unanimously to allow it.  One state (Rhode Island)...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

refused permission and the tariff could not be implemented.  Finally, there was Shays’ Rebellion.  This was mainly a state matter, but when Massachusetts asked Congress for help, Congress had no legal power to help and no way to fund any action that it could take.  All of these things show that the Articles were a failure.

Second, this question might be asking what caused the Articles to fail.  The answer is that they failed because they gave too much power to the states and not enough to the national government.  The Articles were set up in this way because Americans wanted a government that would be unlike that of England. They did not want a strong central government that could tyrannize them.  However, they went too far and created a national government that barely existed.  The national government could not force the states to do anything.  It could not even levy taxes to support a military.  Instead, it had to ask the states for money, something that the states were rarely willing to provide.  The federal government could not stop states from setting up trade barriers against one another and it could not stop them from making their own policies with respect to foreign trade.  The Articles of Confederation set up a very loose union of states that were practically independent countries.  Because it did this, it failed to create a strong, unified country.

References

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Why were the Articles of Confederation unsuccessful?

After the colonists won their independence from Great Britain, they didn’t want to create a federal government that had too much power. As a result, the federal government was a fairly weak institution.

The federal government could not do many things. For example, the federal government could not levy taxes. Thus, it was difficult for the federal government to pay its debts. Since there was no central bank, too much money was printed, causing inflation to occur. Besides the federal government, each state also was able to print money.

The federal government couldn’t make people join the military. As a result, the federal government struggled to deal with aggressive actions that other countries took toward the United States. The Spanish and British interfered with American trade. The British wouldn’t leave forts in the western lands that belonged to the United States. The American military was not in a position to deal with these actions by other countries.

The federal government also had trouble dealing with uprisings within the country. When Shays' Rebellion occurred, it was the state militia of Massachusetts that ended the rebellion, not the American army.

There also was no court system. As a result, there was no place that states could go to resolve disputes that they had with each other.

Approved by eNotes Editorial