Student Question
Why was wealth unevenly distributed in the Hellenistic world?
Quick answer:
Wealth in the Hellenistic world was unevenly distributed due to economic structures reliant on labor-intensive agriculture, with about 80% of the population working the land. This left most people with little surplus, while powerful elites controlled excess production. Additionally, a lack of middle class and a system of patronage, where the wealthy provided for the poor, further entrenched this inequality. Land and power were inherited, making social mobility difficult and maintaining the wealth divide.
Wealth was unevenly distributed in the Hellenistic world because that was how things were everywhere during that time and even for a long time afterwards. The reason for this is that the economies were so dependent on labor that individuals generally could not be productive enough to make much money.
In the Hellenistic world, something like 80% of the entire adult populace had to be working on the land. This meant that the great bulk of society was making only enough for themselves and a few other people. When you have a system like that, powerful elites tend to take all of the excess production and leave very little for those who produce it.
Because they had little excess wealth, and because they certainly had no feeling that wealth ought to be spread in a democratic way, the wealth in these societies was very unevenly distributed.
Why was wealth distributed unevenly in the Hellenistic world?
This is...
Unlock This Answer Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
a great question. I am glad that there are some people actually studying this fascinating time of history. The Hellenistic world is very much like many other ancient time periods in terms of its economy. There was a very very small percentage of people who were wealthy and the rest of the population was poor. There was no such thing as a middle class. This might seem surprising, but if you think about how the ancient world operated, it makes good sense. Let me give you two perspectives.
First, you had your landed aristocracy. These were the people who possessed land and prestige. This land and power would be passed down from one generation to another and it rarely ever left families. So, it was very difficult for anyone to break into this class. The rest of the population would be poor and die poor.
Second and more importantly, the Hellenistic world was based on what we call patronage. This basically meant that the poor would be supported by rich patrons. The landed aristocracy would give money, food and other support to many people in their community. The rich would also be the ones who built roads, aqueducts, and other large projects. From this perspective, the poor had a recourse to survive through the patronage system that was in place. More importantly, this patronage system perpetuated the divide between the rich and everyone else.