Editor's Choice

How did the hostility of the American media contribute to the loss of the Vietnam War?

Quick answer:

The American media played a significant role in shifting public opinion against the Vietnam War, although not directly causing its loss. Initially, media coverage focused on the rise of communism, but as the war progressed, uncensored reports highlighted American casualties and military deception, eroding public confidence. Influential media figures like Walter Cronkite declared the war unwinnable, leading to diminished support. The media's objective reporting revealed truths that undermined the war effort, contributing to its eventual loss.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The media was not so much responsible for the loss of the Vietnam War; however, it was responsible for shifting public opinion to a stance of being strongly against the war. In the beginning, there was not a strong journalistic interest in the conflict, and journalistic stories focused mostly on the rise of communism in the area. At the height of the war, however, due largely to the amount of citizens being drafted, there were over 600 journalists operating in Vietnam.

Many people do indeed hold the belief that the media played a role in undermining the American war effort in Vietnam; however, the media coverage could not very well be called hostile. It was simply objective. Vietnam was referred to popularly as "the first television war," and events were being reported uncensored. These stories brought to light the sheer amount of American casualties, which was the biggest reason that support faltered.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

I don't think that "hostility" is the appropriate word; however the media were a substantial factor, not so much in the loss of the war as in revealing the deceptive practices of the military in misrepresenting progress in the war. As a result of information provided by the media, the U.S. public lost confidence in the war effort. The U.S. would have lost the war regardless of the press; however were it not for the reporting of the press, the war itself might have been prolonged.

The American commander in Vietnam, Gen. William Westmoreland, sent exaggerated reports of enemy casualties and U.S. progress to then President Lyndon Johnson. Johnson relied on the reports he received from Westmoreland and unwittingly also deceived the American public. Westmoreland continuously insisted that a U.S. victory was close at hand; yet the victory did not materialize, and American support at home quickly faded. The role of the Press was primarily to keep the public informed, but it's effect was devastating to the war effort. Life magazine ran a story entitled One Week's Dead in Vietnam. it was a photo article which looked like a high school year book, showing pictures of those who had died in the war in a single week. Both Time and Newsweek magazines carried editorials urging withdrawal from Vietnam. Ultimately Walter Cronkite, the most respected newsman in the U.S. commented in his nightly news program that he thought the war was unwinnable. After learning of Cronkite's comment, Lyndon Johnson told an advisor:

If I've lost Walter Cronkite, I've lost Mr. and Mrs. Average Citizen.

The war continued for several more years; however it was obvious at this point that the U.S. could not win, and public support for the war was forever lost.

Among the other casualties of the war was General Westmoreland himself. He ran for governor of his home state of South Carolina, hoping to use that office as a stepping stone to the presidency. He was defeated in the Republican primary, and never again entered politics.

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Approved by eNotes Editorial