How could Karl Pearson's ideas, which justified imperial expansion, provoke a climate of international violence?

Karl Pearson was known to believe that civilization was produced by the struggle of race with race, and the survival of the fitter race.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

I would argue that Pearson was more than "a bit" racist, and it is his racial attitudes that would provoke a climate of international violence.

Pearson argued from a Social Darwinist perspective.  He believed that nations competed with one another and whoever was more "fit" would win out in the end.  To Pearson, humankind had to compete or deteriorate.  If people stopped having wars, "natural selection" would stop working on people and the race as a whole would degenerate.

If those views were widely held, you can see how they would create a climate of international violence.  This could happen in at least two ways.  First of all, they would provoke a scramble to colonize "lesser" peoples and that scramble might lead to conflict between European countries over who would rule what.  Second, and more importantly, if you take these ideas seriously, then it is important for your country to go out and fight to make sure that it keeps improving.  People like Theodore Roosevelt believed in this kind of idea, which provided a reason for Roosevelt to ardently back the Spanish-American War.

If you take Pearson's Social Darwinism seriously, countries have to fight wars in oreder to improve themselves and keep from degenerating.  If many countries believe in that, you have climate of international violence.

See eNotes Ad-Free

Start your 48-hour free trial to get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Approved by eNotes Editorial