Student Question

How did the English justify taking land from the Indians?

Quick answer:

The English justified taking land from Native Americans through ethnocentrism and differing views on land ownership. They believed they were superior—more civilized and Christian compared to the "pagan" Indians. Additionally, the English concept of individual land ownership, which required visible use, clashed with Native practices. Seeing much land as "unused," due to depopulation from disease, they considered it unoccupied and available for claiming.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

There were two main factors that allowed the British to feel as though they had the right to take land away from the Indians. 

The first reason had to do with what we might call ethnocentrism today.  What this means is that the British felt that they were superior to the Native Americans.  The British were, by their own lights, more civilized than the Indians.  They were Christian while the Indians were pagan.  These factors meant that the British were better than the Indians and were justified in displacing them.

The second reason had to do with ideas about the ownership of land.  The British believed in the idea of individual ownership of land.  Each piece of land belonged to an identifiable person and was generally being used in some visible way.  This was not the case in the New World.  The Indians did not practice individual ownership.  Much of their land, particularly since European diseases had devastated their populations, looked unused to English eyes.  Therefore, the British felt that the land was unoccupied and open to be claimed by anyone who could do so.

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Approved by eNotes Editorial