Discussion Topic
Gandhi's "Quit India" Speech: Importance, Purpose, and Impact on Independence
Summary:
Gandhi's "Quit India" speech, delivered on August 8, 1942, was pivotal in advocating for India's independence through non-violent resistance, known as ahimsa. Gandhi emphasized unity among Indians and urged them to oppose British imperialism without hatred. Despite the immediate suppression of the movement and arrests of its leaders, the speech galvanized Indian support for independence. It highlighted the impracticality of British rule during World War II, setting the stage for India's eventual independence.
What was the purpose of Gandhi's "Quit India" speech and how did it impact India's independence?
"Quit India" speech by Mohandas Gandhi, 1942
After the "Quit India" speech, there were non-violent marches and demonstrations. Unfortunately for the protestors, many were incarcerated by the British in an attempt to halt their activities. Nevertheless, the "Quit India" movement united India; consequently, after Britain suffered tremendous losses in World War II, it was forced to release its hold on much of India.
Having first exercised nonviolent civil disobedience in the resident Indian community's struggle for civil rights as an expatriate lawyer in South Africa, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi led the India people in the famous Dandi Salt March and later in his call for non-violent protest--Ahisma--in his "Quit India" speech in 1942. Certainly, Ghandi's was a voice to be heard because of his previous leadership, and because of the reasonableness of his argument that a non-violent struggle is equal to the democratic ideal as it brings equal freedom for all. Further, Ghandi understood that the Indian people...
Unlock
This Answer NowStart your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
needed to unify and ignore the differences between Hindu and Muslim.
In the democracy which I have envisaged, a democracy established by non-violence, there will be equal freedom for all. Everybody will be his own master. It is to join a struggle for such democracy that I invite you today. Once you realize this you will forget the differences between the Hindus and Muslims, and think of yourselves as Indians only, engaged in the common struggle for independence.
As the leader of the Indian National Congress, Gandhi made a passionate call to his countrymen toward non-violent protest (satyagrah) against the imperialism of the British colonial government:
The proposal for the withdrawal of British power did not come out of anger. It came to enable India to play its due part at the present critical juncture. It is not a happy position for a big country like India to be merely helping with money and material obtained willy-nilly from her while the United Nations are conducting the war. We cannot evoke the true spirit of sacrifice and velour, so long as we are not free.
In other words, Gandhi felt that India could have no pride without being independent, for only then could it choose to sacrifice for altruistic motives, not from oppression. Gandhi also felt that hatred holds people back and prohibits them from making struggles that will improve his conditions. Therefore, he urged his people not to hate the British, but to, instead, hate British imperialism, a system that restricted the Indians from achieving individual dignity in freedom.
After Gandhi's powerful speech, there were numerous arrests of members of the Congress. With respect to the achievement of the immediate objectives of "Quit India," there was failure because of British suppression, poor management of the non-violent movement, and a lack of a clear plan of action. However, the British government realized that in the long run, India would be ungovernable as Britain found itself enmeshed in World War II and the Indian political parties did not support the war. For, after the Congress Working Committee meeting at Wardha the previous month of July, 1942, a resolution was passed, demanding complete independence from the British government that proposed massive civil disobedience if the British did not agree to the demands. But, when this passive resistance began, there were more arrests. Ghandi's plan for unification in which Hindu and Muslim lived in peace as they "forgot the differences" also failed as Muslim nationalism emerged and made demands for a separate Muslim homeland fashioned out of India. Despite all these setbacks, however, there were many Indians who embraced Gandhi's passive non-violent form of civil-disobedience, and protests continued as peasants were angered by new taxes because of the war. It was only the great famine of 1943 that suspended protest movements.
Why was Gandhi's "Quit India" speech important?
Gandhi delivered his "Quit India" speech on August 8, 1942. In the speech, he emphasized his belief in ahimsa, a Sanskrit word meaning "not to injure," and dedicated himself to non-violence to achieve Indian independence from Great Britain. He said:
"Ours is not a drive for power, but purely a nonviolent fight for India’s independence. In a violent struggle, a successful general has been often known to effect a military coup and to set up a dictatorship. But under the Congress scheme of things, essentially nonviolent as it is, there can be no room for dictatorship. A non-violent soldier of freedom will covet nothing for himself, he fights only for the freedom of his country."
This speech is important because the All-India Congress Committee had decided on a policy to end British rule in India immediately, and they recognized Gandhi as the leader in this campaign. He gave he gave two "Quit India" speeches, one in English and one in Hindi, to launch this non-violent campaign for Indian independence. These speeches mark the beginning of this campaign. However, the leaders of the movement were jailed less than 24 hours after he gave this speech.