Discussion Topic
Comparison of Lincoln's, Johnson's, and Congressional Reconstruction Plans and Their Impact on Society
Summary:
Lincoln's, Johnson's, and Congressional Reconstruction Plans differed significantly in their approaches to rebuilding the post-Civil War United States. Lincoln's plan, the Ten-Percent Plan, aimed for leniency and quick reunification, requiring a small loyalty oath and the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment. Johnson's plan was even more lenient, focusing on state-led initiatives and offering pardons, but lacked provisions for former slaves. Congressional Reconstruction, led by Radical Republicans, emphasized equality and protection for freedmen, requiring stricter loyalty oaths and enforcing civil rights through federal intervention.
Compare Lincoln's, Johnson's, and the Congressional Reconstruction Plans. How did they change North and South societies?
Even before the end of the Civil War, there were differences of opinion about how the rebellious states would be readmitted into the Union, how the Confederates would be treated, and what would be done with the former slaves of the Southern states.
Abraham Lincoln wanted to use Reconstruction to reunite the nation as kindly as possible. In his second inaugural address, he called for healing the nation "with malice toward none, with charity for all." His idea was based on the Ten-Percent Plan. This would require just ten percent of eligible voters from the former rebellious states to publicly swear loyalty to the Union before their states would be readmitted. Once that was done, the states would be allowed to draft new state constitutions and elect their own state legislatures. They would still be required to ratify the Thirteenth Amendment freeing their slaves. It also would grant amnesty to...
Unlock
This Answer NowStart your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
Confederate leaders. Lincoln hoped that this magnanimous offer would encourage the South to accept defeat.
Lincoln was assassinated before his plan could be implemented. When Andrew Johnson assumed the presidency, he kept many of Lincoln's provisions in place, but he also made some notable changes. Johnson was even more generous to the defeated South. This may be because he was a Southerner and had certain sympathies for other Southerners. His main objective was to reunite the country, but he felt no need to impose punishments on the former rebels. He required each former Confederate state to officially repeal its article of secession and directly petition him for readmittance. Once that was done, he restored all confiscated property to the defeated rebels. Johnson also did not have much, if any, concern for the population of former slaves. His Reconstruction plan made almost no provisions for their wellbeing.
Congressional Reconstruction was the most divergent of the three. After the Civil War, the Republican Party, led by a coalition known as the Radical Republicans, had a supermajority in Congress that was able to override Johnson's veto power. As a result, they successfully passed numerous Reconstruction-related laws. Their priorities were more focused on punishing the former rebels and protecting the Black population than smoothly reuniting the states. Instead of just ten percent, they wanted half of all eligible voters in the Southern states to swear loyalty as a condition for readmittance. Congress also expanded the mission of the Freedman's Bureau, which was tasked with integrating former slaves into society. It ordered the US Army into the South to protect the newly-gained rights of Black people. Furthermore, Congressional Reconstruction required the Southern states to ratify the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to be readmitted.
References
What are the similarities between Lincoln's, Johnson's, and Congress's Reconstruction plans?
Lincoln's plan for Reconstruction was called the Ten Percent Plan. In it, ten percent of the eligible voters in a state in 1860 would have to take a loyalty oath to the Union in order for that state to be readmitted into the Union. States would also have to ratify the Thirteenth Amendment. Lincoln did not want to hang former Confederate leaders; rather, he hoped that they would seek asylum abroad and never return to the United States. Lincoln's plan was still evolving at the time of his assassination in April 1865.
Johnson, who was on the presidential ticket in 1864 to provide balance, did not see Reconstruction the same way. Johnson vetoed additional funding to the Freedmen's Bureau, as he believed that Reconstruction should be a state-mandated affair. He thought that black suffrage should also be led at the state level, rather than through a constitutional amendment. While he did seek to punish the rich plantation owners, he wanted the poor whites who made up the bulk of the former Confederate army to be able to vote.
Johnson's plan was considered too lenient, as Johnson would ultimately grant several pardons to individual rich Southerners allowing them back into political life. Congress passed the Wade-Davis bill, which allowed suffrage for all black males. It also mandated that fifty percent of those eligible to vote in 1860 would have to take loyalty oaths. Many Radical Republicans were in favor of persecuting the former Confederate leadership. While Johnson was initially hailed by them as being harsher than Lincoln, he was treated as a traitor when he pushed for states to take the lead on Reconstruction. Johnson's inability to get along with Congress ultimately led to his impeachment.