Student Question

According to John Marshall's reasoning, how should the 10th Amendment's reservation of powers to the states be interpreted?

The 10th Amendment states that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, not prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people."

Quick answer:

John Marshall interpreted the 10th Amendment as allowing for implied powers of Congress through the "necessary and proper" clause in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution. While the 10th Amendment reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to the states or the people, Marshall emphasized that Congress could exercise powers deemed necessary to execute its constitutional responsibilities, thus expanding federal authority beyond explicitly listed powers.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”  --Tenth Amendment to the Constitution

When the Constitution was written, those against strong federal powers (called Anti-federalists), wanted to add amendments to guarantee individual liberties and the sovereignty of the states. The Tenth Amendment basically states that if a power was not mentioned in the Constitution for the federal government, it was reserved to the states or the people. In this way, the states would be guaranteed to keep many powers that they were accustomed to.

Because of this Amendment, most Americans believed that Congress had only the powers that were listed in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution. Most Americans failed to read the fine print. Clause 18 of that section states the following:

The Congress shall have Power ... To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

John Marshall, as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, reasoned that this stipulation in Article 1 enabled Congress more powers than maybe most citizens had previously thought.  The "necessary and proper" clause can be used to justify a wide range of actions by Congress.  This application of Section 8 has come to be known as the "implied powers" of Congress.  This does not stop citizens from challenging the actions of Congress or the president in court.  Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the courts to decide what an implied power is.

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

References

Approved by eNotes Editorial