The History of Herodotus

by Herodotus

Start Free Trial

Characters

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Histories offers an account of the Greco-Persian War, explaining the early fifth-century BCE conflict and lingering in the sixth-century circumstances that led to its eruption. As a work of historical non-fiction, Histories features many historical figures, though their characterization and deeds are a contrivance of Herodotus’s historical style. As such, these figures appear as an amalgam of truth and hearsay, born of the observations of those who encountered them and were affected by them, a collection of divisive realities the author combines into a single entity. Indeed, the characters featured in Herodotus’s Histories offer a loose account of who these men and women truly were, and scholars often question the accuracy of Herodotus’s true-to-life intentions. Authenticity aside, these are some of the most important figures who appear in the work: 

Croesus

The King of Lydia, an ancient kingdom located in modern day Turkey, who ruled from approximately 560 to 546 BCE. Croesus’s rule intersected with the rise of Cyrus the Great, the first king of the newly-formed Persian Empire, who gained his thrown by overthrowing his grandfather, Astyages. Upset at this development, Croesus began to prepare for war, intending to quash the upstart nation finding its footing along his borders. He sought the advice of the Delphic Oracle and received the famously misleading advice: “If you attack, a great empire shall fall.” Attack he did, and in 546 BCE, Lydia, a thriving nation and “great empire,” fell to their Persian neighbors. While tertiary to the main narrative arc of the Greco-Persian War, the fall of Croesus and the defeat of Lydia act as the opening victory that led the Persian Empire to its expansionist, conquest-oriented ways. Croesus’s misstep launched the Persian expansion engine and, in so doing, catalyzed the eventual war the Histories records.

Cyrus the Great

In 550 BCE, Cyrus II of Persia founded the Achaemenid Empire, also known as the first Persian Empire, which united the Medes and Persians. Under his rule, the empire quickly expanded, conquering the neighboring state of Lydia,then the Neo-Babylonian Empire, and, later, some areas of Southwest Asia. Cyrus was a skilled ruler and administrator and offered his subjects an unusual degree of religious freedom and human rights. The early days of the Persian Empire were marked by rapid expansion, and these early successes filtered through the rulers to come, inspiring even further growth and conquest. However, the empire’s expansion-minded governance did not indicate a lapse in internal governance. Cyrus established a governing ethos of goodwill and fair treatment that would live on in his successors, just as his desire for conquest.

Cambyses II

The son of Cyrus the Great, Cambyses II ruled for a relatively short time, dying childless of a gangrenous wound after a battle in Syria. Camybses II continued the expansion program of his father and added Egypt to the Persian Empire.

Darius

Darius I or Darius the Great lived from approximately 550 to 486 BC. He was responsible for several administrative reforms of the Persian Empire, including its division into provinces, creation of an extensive road network, and standardization of weights and measures. He was the son of the satrap of Bactria, and stories of how he replaced Cambyses on the throne are varied and not entirely reliable. Darius led the empire to new heights, earning several military successes in the east before eventually beginning a western campaign which ended with his defeat at the Battle of Marathon. Under Darius’s rule, Persia embarked on the campaign that directly led to the Greco-Persian War, catalyzing the Ionian Revolt and bringing about two decades of major conflict that would ultimately cripple Persian...

(This entire section contains 911 words.)

Unlock this Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

expansionism.

Xerxes

Xerxes was the son of Darius, and he continued his father's attempted conquest of Greece. He succeeded temporarily after great losses in the Battle of Thermopylae but was eventually defeated by the Athenian navy at Salamis. Despite his surprising losses in Greece, Xerxes successfully quashed revolts in Babylon and Egypt. He was the last of the Achaemenidean kings to rule over the empire at its territorial height and, though he did not complete his father’s goal of conquering Greece, he kept a firm grasp on Persia’s already-conquered assets. One of the most important figures of the later books of the Histories, Xerxes is characterized as an extremely powerful, almost insurmountably so, tactician and leader. His efforts paired with the overpowering nature of his forces and resources indicated that Persian victory was an inevitability.

Themistocles 

An Athenian general and great naval strategist, Themistocles engineered a successful strategy resulting in the defeat of the Persians at Salamis. After the Battle of Marathon, the already-successful politician rose to the highest ranks of Athenian governance. It was under his guidance that the Athenians improved their navy, building nearly 200 hundred ships that would prove critical assets during the Second Persian Invasion and lead Athens to decisive victory at the Battle of Salamis. 

Leonidas

Leonidas, the king of Sparta, led a heroic defense of the pass of Thermopylae against a much larger Persian force, though he was eventually defeated by treachery. His willingness to fight against insurmountable odds represented Greece’s determination and stubborn refusal to surrender to the Persians. That their defeat could only be accomplished by stealth and betrayal speaks volumes to the wartime dynamic at play. Although Leonidas died in combat, the bravery of his Spartans spoke to the Greek spirit and inspired further defiance that, ultimately, led to Greek victory in the following year.

Previous

Themes

Next

Analysis

Loading...