Student Question
Would "Herzog" be more authentic if written in the first person instead of third?
Quick answer:
Writing "Herzog" in the third person allows Saul Bellow to explore the protagonist's thoughts and emotions as effectively as a first-person narrative would. This perspective focuses on masculine dilemmas and often excludes female voices, creating a narrative that might alienate women readers. While a first-person narrative could offer a more intimate view, Bellow's third-person style maintains his thematic focus on male experiences and internal conflicts.
Saul Bellow wrote in 3rd person frequently. At Saulbellow.org there is a lengthy essay that explains quite a bit about the man and his times:
"Those novels and short stories which use third-person omniscient point-of-view, also report the interior thoughts and emotions of a principal male protagonist, whose inner dialogue functions much the same way as the first-person monologues. Furthermore, the novels usually construct an implied male reader, or narratee. This narrative construction, which automatically focuses the reader on masculine dilemmas and sensibility, nearly always eclipses the female voice, and ultimately creates within itself the narrative conditions of a misogynous collusion of men against women. Invariably women readers find themselves having to identify with the male protagonists, who assume a male audience, and collude with them in the condemnation of the women characters. Failing this, they must remain outside the text, alienated from this colony of embattled men.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.