Henrik Ibsen is widely acknowledged as the father of modern drama, but his significance in literature and history overshadows the influence of his revolutionary stage techniques and his iconoclastic concept of the theater. James Joyce observed of Ibsen, his youthful idol, “It may be questioned whether any man has held so firm an empire over the thinking world in modern times.” Despite early disappointments, which led to twenty-seven years of self-imposed exile from Norway, Ibsen at last received the acclaim there that he had been accorded previously throughout Europe, and by the end of his long and immensely productive career, the Norwegian government granted him a state funeral as one of its most illustrious, if controversial, citizens. Ibsen’s plays continue to be revived throughout the world, and a steady stream of scholarly books and articles testifies to his popularity among critics and readers who appreciate the therapeutic Northern blasts of Ibsen’s message.
The unvarying setting of Ibsen’s quest as a creative artist was the human mind. At first, he concentrated, with little success, on Norwegian nationalistic themes and historical subjects, in opposition to the Danish domination of Scandinavian theater. As he probed increasingly profound psychological themes involving the individual and society, his analytic dramas seemed threateningly radical, largely incomprehensible, or simply obscene to European audiences then content with frothy farce or Scribean melodrama. His first plays written from exile in Italy won for him fame, but their critical...
(The entire section is 644 words.)
In what ways did Henrik Ibsen forge a remarkably effective preparation for his career?
Which accounts for the fact that Ibsen wrote most of his best-known plays while living in Munich and Rome: frustration, a perspective gained by being away, an escape from “the ghosts of the past,” or some other factor?
Was Ibsen a champion of the rebel or an admirer of just a selection of rebellious characteristics?
Show how the structure of Ibsen’s plays demonstrates his correctness in choosing the drama rather than narrative art.
In Hedda Gabler, what is the significance of the oft-repeated phrase about vine leaves in Eilert’s hair?
What does it mean that Ibsen’s plays “complement and correct one another in a dialectical manner”?
The conflict in An Enemy of the People seems very relevant today. Would it have been even more so then if Ibsen had substantiated more effectively the opposition to Dr. Stockmann?
Bloom, Harold, ed. Henrik Ibsen. Philadelphia: Chelsea House, 1999. A collection of criticism regarding Ibsen’s plays. Bibliography and index.
Ferguson, Robert. Henrik Ibsen: A New Biography. London: R. Cohen, 1996. A basic biography that covers the life and works of Ibsen. Bibliography and index.
Garland, Oliver. A Freudian Poetics for Ibsen’s Theatre: Repetition, Recollection, and Paradox. Lewiston, N.Y.: Edwin Mellen, 1998. A Freudian approach to examining the psychology that pervades Ibsen’s plays. Bibliography and index.
Goldman, Michael. Ibsen: The Dramaturgy of Fear. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999. An analysis of Ibsen’s plays with respect to his portrayal of fear. Bibliography and index.
Johnston, Brian. The Ibsen Cycle: The Design of the Plays from “Pillars of Society” to “When We Dead Awaken.” Rev. ed. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992. An examination of some of Ibsen’s social plays. Bibliography and index.
Ledger, Sally. Henrik Ibsen. Plymouth, England: Northcote House in association with the British Council, 1999. A biographical study of the dramatist Ibsen. Bibliography and index.
McFarlane, James, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Ibsen. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994. A comprehensive reference work devoted to Ibsen. Bibliography and index.
Shepherd-Barr, Kirsten. Ibsen and Early Modernist Theatre, 1890-1900. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1997. An examination of Symbolism, modernism and Ibsen, focusing on his reception in England and France. Bibliography and index.
Templeton, Joan. Ibsen’s Women. 1997. Reprint. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001. A study of Ibsen’s drama that examines his portrayal of women. Bibliography and index.
Theoharis, Theoharis Constantine. Ibsen’s Drama: Right Action and Tragic Joy. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996. A critical examination of Ibsen’s plays, with special emphasis on the themes of joy and dutiful action. Bibliography and index.