Themes: Doubt and Ambiguity
As rationality diminishes, doubt and uncertainty begin to dominate. As Marlow travels deeper inland, the reality of his surroundings grows increasingly uncertain. The perceptions, intentions, and reliability of those he meets, including his own, become questionable. Conrad often describes how the wilderness's heat and light cast a spell, leading those who venture further into a dreamlike state. Nothing should be taken at face value. After the Russian leaves, Marlow even doubts whether he truly saw him.
The central mystery of Heart of Darkness is Kurtz himself. Who is he really? What are his actions? What does he genuinely say? Those who know him often commend his exceptional rhetorical skills, yet the reader hears very little of it. The Russian claims loyalty to Kurtz, but we are left wondering why. Kurtz has written a report that supposedly shows his dedication to educating the African natives, yet it ends with the chilling command, "Exterminate all the brutes!" Marlow is told Kurtz is an extraordinary man, but he suspects Kurtz is "hollow at the core." In Marlow's opinion, if Kurtz was remarkable, it was because he had something to express at the end of his life. However, what Kurtz declared was "the horror!" After Kurtz's death, different people approach Marlow, each claiming to have known Kurtz, but none seem to have truly understood him. Was he a painter, a writer, a great musician, or a politician, as he is variously described? Marlow settles on the vague term "universal genius," implying that Kurtz was whatever people wanted to believe he was.
Expert Q&A
Are the "pilgrims" in Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness not referencing missionaries?
In Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, the "pilgrims" are not missionaries. They are agents at the Central Station, driven by greed for ivory and indifferent to the natives' suffering. They waste resources and time, reflecting the overall exploitation by Leopold II's regime in the Congo. Although actual missionaries were present, they lacked the power to prevent the atrocities committed.
What does "the earth seemed unearthly" mean in Heart of Darkness?
This quote from Heart of Darkness means that when Marlow enters the "immense darkness" of the Congo, he doesn't recognize it as belonging to the world as he has known it. He therefore experiences a kind of alienation, a transition from a world that made sense into not only a foreign land but also a different planet altogether.
What is the central question in Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness?
Did Marlow use the term "cannibals" literally or metaphorically in Heart of Darkness?
Marlow uses the term "cannibals" literally in Heart of Darkness, as he hires a crew of native Africans who are actual cannibals. Despite this, he admires their restraint, as they abstain from eating the white men even when food is scarce. This literal use contrasts with the metaphorical "cannibalism" of the European colonizers, who exploit and dehumanize the African natives, questioning who the true savages are.
What is a quote from Heart of Darkness that can be interpreted both psychoanalytically and feministically?
One quotation from Heart of Darkness that can be interpreted both by psychoanalytical and feminist perspectives begins "It's queer how out of touch with truth women are." In this passage, Marlow implies that only men can fully understand or handle what is true. According to him, women are too beautiful or too optimistic but also must be protected from "the horrors" of man. At the story's end, Marlow also "protects" Kurtz's intended by lying to her about Kurtz's last words.
What does Marlow mean by "full of it" in Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness?
In Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, when Marlow says "full of it," he is referring to the hubris and self-importance of the company employees. They are overly proud and arrogant, believing they are creating an empire and becoming rich, but Marlow views them with contempt, seeing their actions as morally questionable and driven by profit rather than humanity.
Is Heart of Darkness racist, or does Conrad's work have deeper implications?
Heart of Darkness is often debated for its portrayal of racism. While it reflects racist attitudes by today's standards, it also offers deeper critiques of European imperialism. The story uses the character Marlow to highlight the inhumanity of colonialism, portraying Africans as symbols of dark mystery, yet also critiquing the colonial system. Readers must assess whether the work is inherently racist or a condemnation of colonial attitudes, drawing on textual evidence to form their interpretations.
The significance and interpretation of the structure in Conrad's Heart of Darkness
The structure of Heart of Darkness is significant for its frame narrative, where Marlow tells his story within the story, creating layers of perspective. This technique emphasizes the themes of ambiguity and the complexity of truth, as readers must navigate multiple viewpoints. The structure also mirrors the journey into the unknown, both geographically and psychologically.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.
