Themes: The Illusion of Freedom
In the story’s authoritarian society, the ideal of equality becomes an oppressive weight that all must bear, albeit to differing degrees. While the citizens speak favorably of equality, it can be argued that the driving force for this social structure isn’t equality at all. The driving force is fear in the form of authoritarian rule, one that negates the freedom of its citizens.
The story’s citizens generally accept the idea that their society’s vision of equality is preferable to jealousy and competition. But this acceptance doesn’t stem from empathy or compassion—it stems from harsh consequences in the form of fines, jail time, and even death. This fear is illuminated when Hazel suggests that George relieve some of his burden; George refuses, because he would face steep consequences if he attempted to do so. For George, it is better to bear his harsh handicaps than to risk losing the life he currently has. He has the illusion of choice, but in no way is George actually free to make said choice. With the government using fear tactics, he is a prisoner no matter which choice he makes. Moreover, George cannot conceive of any alternative for long, because his very thoughts are limited.
Vonngeut’s story shows that while difference may cause jealousy and competition, without it, society is doomed to face a monotonous and controlling reality in which each citizen must forfeit their basic rights. Indeed, what the story’s characters gain in equality comes at the cost of their freedom.
Expert Q&A
Why does Harrison Bergeron declare himself emperor?
Harrison Bergeron declares himself emperor to assert his authority as he casts off his handicaps. He uses the highest possible royal title to emphasize that he wants to create an unequal society in which there will be rich rewards for being outstanding, and Harrison is claiming primacy in this new order.
Did Harrison's rebellion accomplish anything in the short story "Harrison Bergeron"?
Harrison's rebellion achieved little immediate impact in "Harrison Bergeron." His bold defiance, removing his handicaps and briefly freeing others on live TV, ended abruptly with his death, leaving no lasting influence on the conformist society. His parents' indifferent reaction underscores this lack of effect. However, optimistically, his actions might inspire future dissent against the oppressive regime, potentially sparking a broader resistance movement if others recognize the flaws in enforced equality.
Why was the Handicapper General, Diana Moon Glampers, afraid of Harrison Bergeron breaking free?
Diana Moon Glampers, the Handicapper General, fears Harrison Bergeron breaking free because he threatens the enforced equality system she upholds. Harrison's superior intellect and strength could dismantle this system, challenging her authority and potentially inspiring others to reject their handicaps. In a society dependent on compliance with its restrictive laws, any act of rebellion could lead to widespread defiance, undermining the social order Glampers seeks to maintain.
In "Harrison Bergeron," why don't people rebel against oppression?
In "Harrison Bergeron," people don't rebel against oppression because the society has embraced laws ensuring equality of outcome, not opportunity. These laws, stemming from public demand, prevent anyone from excelling, thus keeping everyone at the same societal level. Furthermore, the handicaps imposed on individuals, like George's mental handicap, inhibit their ability to think critically or recognize the immorality of the laws, effectively preventing rebellion.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.
