I agree with my colleagues that Diana Moon Glampers is a flat character.
By definition, flat characters are less developed, often two-dimensional,
and sketchy at best.
Nonetheless, these characters are still important to many works of literature.
In Harrison Bergeron, Diana Moon Glampers exemplifies the evils of government
control. While she looks average (much like Harrison's mother, Hazel), she is
far from equal to the other citizens in the story. She, in fact, has power over
everyone. Her character is in the story to show the inequality and
corruption of a communistic society. So, while she is flat, she is definitely
important to the story.
I located a site that has a pretty good chart (along with some other information) about round, flat, static, and dynamic characters that may be of some help to you.
Remember:
Round Characters are more fully developed
Flat Characters are undeveloped and two-dimensionalDynamic...
Unlock This Answer Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
Characters undergo change over the course of the story
Static Characters do not change.
Therefore, a flat character will likely NEVER be a dynamic character; since they are only the sketch of a character, they are never developed enough to undergo a major change of heart or experience growth like a round character can.
Interestingly, in many fairy tales and in some very short stories, there are NO round characters. ALL of the characters may be stereotypes with no real development other than their symbolic significance.
Diana Moon Glampers, the handicapper general, is a flat character. If she were round, the outcome of the story would have been totally changed because she would have likely had a change of heart, she would have relaxed the laws or else taken pity on Harrison and spared him his life. To the contrary, Diana undergoes no change throughout the story. She decrees the law, she enforces it, and when Harrison does not follow through, she executes him and the ballerina. There can really be no argument to the contrary here; Diana is flat.