Hamlet
Extended Character Analysis
Hamlet is the Prince of Denmark, the son of the recently deceased King Hamlet, and the protagonist of the play. He returns to Denmark from the University of Wittenberg in the wake of his father’s death. He is disgusted by his mother Gertrude’s marriage to his uncle Claudius, which happened very soon after his father’s death. Hamlet idolizes his father and, even before learning of his murder, mourns him in what others view as excessive. He is educated, brooding, and prone to overthinking. He uses soliloquies to belittle other characters, express moral truths, externalize internal conflicts, and give readers a glimpse into his mind.
After returning home from university for his father’s funeral, Hamlet finds himself disgusted by the incestuous, by Elizabethan standards, marriage between his widowed mother and his uncle Claudius. He is openly hostile towards Claudius, constantly drawing comparisons between his uncle and his deceased father. When the ghost of his father appears and tells Hamlet to seek revenge, Hamlet is dismayed to hear about the murder but also admits to having suspected it. He vows to avenge his father, but he has some doubts about the veracity of the ghost’s claims.
In the process of trying to prove Claudius’s guilt, Hamlet ruins most of his relationships. Fearful that his plans might be exposed, he feigns madness in an effort to keep suspicion at bay. However, given that only Horatio understands his act, Hamlet is left without any other allies. Hamlet’s single-minded pursuit of revenge against Claudius leaves him disillusioned with others. Ultimately he is betrayed, at least in his mind, by Gertrude, Ophelia, Rosencrantz, and Guildenstern. Hamlet views Claudius as such a villain that he is unable to trust anyone who might be associated with him. Instead, Hamlet ineffectually rants about the fickle nature of humans and bemoans his own cowardice at both exacting revenge and facing the unknowns of death.
Hamlet’s tragic flaw is his indecisiveness, which has spawned a number of theories about his inability to kill Claudius until the very last moment. One interpretation is that Hamlet has doubts about the veracity of the ghost’s claims—doubts which are often read as rooted in religious conflict. Though Hamlet is set prior to the Protestant Reformation, Elizabethan England was in the midst of the conflict between Catholicism and Protestantism. Hamlet himself questions whether the ghost is truly his father returned from Purgatory, as Catholic theology would suggest, or whether it is a devil in disguise, as Protestant theology would suggest. The point of the play within the play in act III, scene II is to prove Claudius’s guilt so that Hamlet can known for certain whether his revenge is justified. However, after getting the necessary proof, Hamlet is unable to exact his vengeance. In act III, scene III, he refuses to kill Claudius while the man prays so as not to send his soul to heaven. Hamlet’s refusal leads many to seek out alternative explanations for Hamlet’s inaction.
Another reading positions Hamlet as a morally conflicted character who is torn between two different callings. One the one hand, he has been tasked with exacting revenge for his father. On the other hand, Christianity, the dominant religion in 14th- and 15th-century Denmark, calls on its followers to avoid murder and revenge, instead leaving matters of justice to God’s judgement. By reading Hamlet’s conflict as religious in nature, his suicidal ideation stands out because Christian doctrine bars him from obtaining any form of relief. Not only can he not exact the revenge that he longs to, but he also cannot end his own life without barring himself...
(This entire section contains 868 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
from salvation.
By yet another reading, Hamlet’s isolation is to blame for his inaction. After learning that Claudius murdered King Hamlet, Hamlet is unable to trust anyone in the castle aside from Horatio, because he has no way of ascertaining who might betray him to Claudius. His isolation prevents him from acquiring allies or spreading the news of Claudius’s treachery. Just as he fears sending Claudius to heaven by killing him while he prays, Hamlet may also fear making a martyr of Claudius. Regicide is a serious crime, and if Hamlet were unable to prove that Claudius killed King Hamlet, then Hamlet himself could become a object of fear and animosity amongst the people of Denmark. This reading is supported by his insistence in act V, scene II that Horatio remain alive in order to clear his “wounded name,” something that the dying Hamlet will not have the chance to do.
Hamlet is an enigmatic character, alternatingly introspective and impulsive. He ultimately accomplishes what the ghost tasks him with, but at the cost of his own life and the lives of six others. Unlike most Elizabethan revenge tragedies, Hamlet does not end on a triumphant note. There is no final confrontation between Hamlet and Claudius, nor is there any sense of vindication for the ghost. Instead, Horatio is left to lament a senseless bloodbath. Revenge winds up feeling almost meaningless, accomplished as a final desperate act in the face of death.
Expert Q&A
Why does Hamlet recall the story of Priam and Pyrrhus in Act 2 of Hamlet?
Hamlet recalls the story of Priam and Pyrrhus and asks the player to present a speech about it because Hamlet believes that it closely resembles his visualization of future events in his own situation, that of Pyrrhus (representing Hamlet himself) killing King Priam (representing his uncle, Claudius) in revenge for the death of his father, while Priam's wife, Hecuba (representing Hamlet's mother, Gertrude), stands by helplessly.
Conclusions about Hamlet
Conclusions about Hamlet often focus on his complex character, marked by indecision, existential angst, and a deep contemplation of life and death. His tragic flaw, procrastination, leads to his downfall and the demise of many around him. Themes of revenge, madness, and political intrigue also underscore the play's exploration of human nature and morality.
Analysis of Hamlet as a revenge play
Hamlet is a quintessential revenge play, reflecting the genre's conventions through its focus on vengeance, moral corruption, and the protagonist's inner turmoil. The play centers on Prince Hamlet's quest to avenge his father's murder by his uncle, King Claudius. This pursuit leads to a complex exploration of themes such as justice, madness, and the consequences of revenge, highlighting the tragic dimensions of human nature.
The comparison and contrast between Hamlet and Laertes
Hamlet and Laertes are both driven by a desire to avenge their fathers' deaths, but their approaches differ significantly. Hamlet is contemplative and hesitant, often overthinking and delaying action. In contrast, Laertes is impulsive and quick to act without much deliberation. Their contrasting characteristics highlight different responses to similar circumstances and underscore the themes of revenge and justice in the play.
Hamlet's "fishmonger" insult to Polonius and its implications
In Hamlet, when Hamlet calls Polonius a "fishmonger," he uses the term to mock Polonius's lower status and meddling nature. The insult suggests Polonius's intrusive behavior and his role in manipulating his daughter, Ophelia, for information. While Polonius does not react as if insulted, he interprets Hamlet's words as madness, highlighting his own lack of humor and snobbishness. Hamlet's use of "fishmonger" reflects his disdain for Polonius's dishonesty and interference in his affairs.
In the "Nunnery scene," does Hamlet show any signs of knowing he's being watched?
In the "Nunnery scene," Hamlet shows signs of knowing he's being watched. His behavior towards Ophelia, including his verbal abuse and formal responses, suggests he is aware of the eavesdropping. Additionally, his pointed questions about her father and remarks intended to be overheard indicate his suspicion that Claudius and Polonius are spying on him.
The foils for Hamlet and their significance
Foils for Hamlet include Laertes, Fortinbras, and Horatio. Laertes' impulsiveness contrasts with Hamlet's indecision, highlighting Hamlet's contemplative nature. Fortinbras' decisive action underscores Hamlet's hesitation, while Horatio's rationality and loyalty emphasize Hamlet's emotional and erratic behavior. These foils enhance our understanding of Hamlet's character and his internal struggles.
Hamlet's reactions to the deaths of his father and Ophelia
Hamlet's reactions to his father's and Ophelia's deaths are marked by intense grief and profound existential contemplation. His father's murder by Claudius propels him into a quest for revenge and deep philosophical inquiry about life and death. Ophelia's death, on the other hand, evokes sorrow and guilt, further intensifying his emotional turmoil and sense of loss.
The reasons for Hamlet's journey to England
Hamlet journeys to England primarily because King Claudius wants to remove him from Denmark, fearing Hamlet's growing threat to his rule. Claudius arranges for Hamlet to be executed upon arrival, masking this plan as a diplomatic mission. Additionally, Hamlet's own erratic behavior and the murder of Polonius add urgency to Claudius's decision to send him away.
Reasons for Hamlet's Cruelty to Ophelia in Act 3
Hamlet's cruelty to Ophelia in Act 3 stems from his deep-seated anger and disillusionment with women, largely due to his mother's hasty remarriage. Additionally, Hamlet may be using Ophelia to further his facade of madness and to drive her away for her own safety, knowing the dangerous path his quest for revenge might take.
