The Ghost of King Hamlet
Extended Character Analysis
The Ghost of King Hamlet provides the inciting incident for the play by charging his son with the task of taking revenge on Claudius. The ghost tells Hamlet that he cannot move on to heaven until his “foul and most unnatural murder” is avenged. Hamlet is skeptical of the ghost at first, wondering whether it is truly the ghost of his father or an instrument of evil that has come to tempt him to commit sin. However, Hamlet already loathes Claudius, so when he uncovers evidence of Claudius’s guilt, Hamlet believes the ghost and embarks on the course of revenge.
The nature of the ghost remains vague throughout the play, with different characters proposing different theories. Marcellus, Bernardo, and Horatio initially assume that, due to its armored guise, the ghost has appeared to warn them about an impending threat to Denmark. They clearly doubt its intentions, only reluctantly allowing Hamlet to be alone with it. Hamlet is also initially unsure whether the ghost is truly his father or a devil in disguise. A significant aspect of Hamlet’s indecision to immediately kill Claudius is his uncertainty about the ghost’s nature.
Several different theories have been proposed regarding the ghost. By one reading, the ghost can be read as the literal manifestation of the late King Hamlet. That other characters see the ghost and that Claudius admits to murdering King Hamlet support such a reading. Using this interpretation, Hamlet’s revenge is successful, and the play conforms to the traditional model of Elizabethan revenge plays.
(The entire section is 535 words.)