Student Question

Is Grendel an unreliable narrator? Why?

Quick answer:

Grendel is considered an unreliable narrator due to his mental instability and fragmented narrative style. His thoughts and observations are often disjointed, indicating slips in his mental stability. The narrative is non-linear, with frequent tangents and imagined encounters, making it difficult to discern reality from hallucinations. This unreliability is further emphasized by his interactions with possibly imaginary characters, such as the Shaper, highlighting the uncertainty of his perspective.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Grendel is a monster. No, really, he is. He's also the narrator of the novel bearing his name, which tells the Beowulf story from his perspective. The story is written in first-person prose, which allows us to get an in-depth look at Beowulf  from the monster's perspective. However, can the reader truly rely on what Grendel is telling us? Is Grendel mentally stable enough to be considered a reliable narrator? Looking at the text, we see that Grendel's thoughts and observations, while moving and enlightening, are not exactly connected. Often, they are punctuated by various slips in mental stability. For example, look at page forty-five, where he says, "I clamped my palms to my ears and stretched up my lips and shrieked again: a stab at truth, a snatch at apocalyptic glee." At this point, Grendel is watching Hrothgar's hall and is hearing the thoughts and words of the men...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

within.

Grendel's narrative is also non-linear. He often goes off on tangents, telling the reader about the past and various Danes who have previously ruled (Scyld Shielding, anyone?). He goes back and forth throughout the novel, offering bits of current happenings to drive the plot forward. 

We also have to consider Grendel's discussion/interaction with the Shaper. Is the Shaper real? Is this a figment of Grendel's imagination? Is it a hallucination? How can we count on Grendel as a narrator if we have no inkling of the stability of his mental state? We know that he is not stable—look at this quote on page 101: "I could see myself . . . running on all fours through the crowd to her . . . drooling and groveling at her small, fur booted feet. 'Mercy!' I would howl . . . I clamped my palms over my eyes and struggled not to laugh." His imagined encounter with Wealtheow gives us an indication that Grendel is not well. We see so many imagined encounters, it is difficult to know which really happened and which are figments of his mind. This is what makes Grendel an unreliable narrator.

Edition used forcitations

Gardner, John. Grendel. Vintage Books: New York, 1989.

Approved by eNotes Editorial