Garry Marshall Criticism
Garry Marshall, a celebrated American comedy writer, scriptwriter, and producer, has been a pivotal figure in the realm of television situation comedies, creating a legacy comparable to that of Norman Lear, the creator of All in the Family. Marshall has written for numerous influential shows, including the Dick Van Dyke Show, praised for its authentic character portrayals and ability to keep sitcom scenarios fresh, as noted by José M. Ferrer. His notable creations from the 1970s include Happy Days, its spin-offs Laverne and Shirley, and Mork and Mindy. Marshall's work is characterized by its ability to depict everyday humor without excessive comedic or serious overtones, with characters like Happy Days' Fonzarelli embodying a blend of coolness and morality, as highlighted by David A. England.
Despite receiving criticism for a perceived lack of depth, as observed by Richard Schickel and Karl E. Meyer, Marshall maintains that his primary goal is entertainment. His shows, which often reflect and reinforce nostalgic 1950s values, as critiqued by Cyclops and John J. O'Connor, remain popular for their humor and cultural resonance. Marshall's series not only amuse but also offer insights into American values and societal norms, creating a significant impact on young audiences through a careful balance of comedy and cultural reflection.
Contents
-
A Good Show Quits While It's Ahead
(summary)
In the following essay, José M. Ferrer praises Garry Marshall's contributions to The Dick Van Dyke Show, emphasizing the show's success in delivering genuine laughter through authentic character portrayal and its ability to keep familiar sitcom scenarios feeling fresh and engaging.
- Howard Thompson
-
'Happy Days' and 'Chopper One' Prove Familiar Fare As A.B.C. Entries
(summary)
In the following essay, John J. O'Connor critiques Garry Marshall's television series "Happy Days," asserting that its nostalgic portrayal of the 1950s is dishonest and undermined by clichéd and sanitized elements designed to evoke sentimentality rather than authenticity.
-
The 'Second Season' Is Second Best
(summary)
In the following essay, John J. O'Connor critiques Garry Marshall's television series "Happy Days" for opting to replicate the nostalgic and clichéd style of earlier shows, portraying a naive and selectively oblivious vision of 1950s innocence through its main character, Richie Cunningham.
- Cyclops
-
Viewpoints: 'Happy Days'
(summary)
In the following essay, Richard Schickel argues that Garry Marshall's television series Happy Days lacks the depth and subtlety of American Graffiti, focusing more on nostalgic humor rather than the genuine adolescent tensions and emotional growth depicted in the film.
-
The Fonz—Spinoff's Secret Weapon
(summary)
In the following essay, John J. O'Connor argues that the character Arthur Fonzarelli, or "The Fonz," from "Happy Days" became a pivotal figure leading to the success of the spin-off "Laverne and Shirley," highlighting themes of rebellion and working-class resilience against societal norms.
-
Blue-Collar Boffo
(summary)
In the following essay, Harry F. Waters examines the appeal of "Laverne and Shirley," highlighting its nostalgic portrayal of 1959 blue-collar life and its resonance with young audiences due to its quaint sexual tone and cultural references.
-
Tuesday Night on the Tube
(summary)
In the following essay, Frank Rich argues that Garry Marshall's television shows, such as Happy Days and Laverne & Shirley, despite borrowing formulas from earlier series, are distinct in their youthful and sexual themes, reflecting a modern and vibrant America compared to the older, more conservative portrayals.
-
Na-No, Na-No
(summary)
In the following essay, Marvin Kitman humorously defends Garry Marshall's creation, Mork and Mindy, as an original and intelligent sitcom, distinguishing it from previous extraterrestrial-themed shows and highlighting its clever cultural satire and appeal among discerning audiences.
-
Happy Days Are Here Again
(summary)
In the following essay, Richard Corliss examines Garry Marshall's work in television, particularly in popular sitcoms like Laverne & Shirley, suggesting that Marshall's success lies in his ability to merge slapstick comedy with sentiment, creating entertainment without moral messages, distinct from the approach of contemporaries like Norman Lear.
-
Pearls in the Trash
(summary)
In the following essay, Karl E. Meyer critiques Mork and Mindy as a prime example of formulaic television, arguing that despite Robin Williams's exceptional talent, the show remains trapped in a repetitive and predictable structure, inhibiting genuine surprise or innovation.
-
Television and the English Teacher
(summary)
In the following essay, David A. England argues that the character of the Fonz from "Happy Days" represents a positive role model who embodies the coexistence of coolness and morality, challenging contemporary adolescent standards by being emotionally honest and consistently good.
-
Reiner Family 'Roast'
(summary)
In the following essay, Frank Rich critiques "The Roast" by Jerry Belson and Garry Marshall, suggesting that while it successfully reveals the dark underbelly of comedic entertainment and has potential with its premise and cast, it ultimately suffers from undeveloped characters and themes, failing to cohesively assemble its numerous comedic elements into a compelling play.