Ideas for Group Discussions
Approaches to discussing Frankenstein are numerous. It can be looked at by itself as a work of literary art. Note the imagery and how it is used to enhance mood while also serving to symbolize the emotions of the characters. Are the characters well developed, or does the novel emphasize plot to the detriment of characterization? The novel can be looked at in its historical context. How does it represent Romanticism? Is it a critique of the science of its day? The universal qualities of the novel also invited comment. Is its indictment of scientific arrogance valid? Does it capture anything important about humanity's quest for knowledge? Do the characters represent anything universal about the human condition. Another interesting approach to the novel would be to see how its story has evolved in the adaptations of others. What about the Frankenstein story has captivated several generations of readers? Why do audiences still respond to the old story? How do the adaptations reflect the interests of their audiences? What is it about the novel that inspires adaptations and sequels?
1. Why is the novel subtitled The Modern Prometheus?
2. Why does Frankenstein create such a large, ugly monster rather than a normal-sized, good-looking man?
3. Why does Frankenstein not make a mate for the monster?
4. Why, initially, does Frankenstein hate his creature?
5. What is the purpose of the De Lacey interlude? How does it relate to the novel as a whole?
6. What conclusion does the monster reach about mankind after hearing Volney's "Ruins of Empires"...
(The entire section is 495 words.)