Summary
Last Updated August 27, 2024.
Background
‘‘A Far Cry from Africa’’ delves into the Mau Mau Uprising in Kenya during the
early 1950s. In the mid-20th century, British colonialism was waning but still
influential globally. In Kenya, British settlers had introduced European ideas
such as money, taxation, and land ownership to the local populace. When the
British inquired, ‘‘Who owns this land?’’ the tribal people replied, ‘‘We do,’’
which the British misinterpreted as referring to the tribal government, even
though individual families owned the land. As the British replaced the tribal
government with their own, they claimed all the land for the new British
administration. Naturally, this infuriated the Kenyan people. They went from
owning and farming their land to becoming laborers for British landowners. As
workers, they were further humiliated by receiving only a fraction of the wages
that British workers earned for the same tasks.
The Kikuyu tribe, the largest and most educated in Kenya, began showing violent resistance against the British in 1951. By 1952, a covert Kikuyu group known as the Mau Mau initiated a violent campaign against the British and any Africans loyal to them. By October 1952, the situation had escalated so severely that the British deployed troops to suppress the rebellion, resulting in a three-year conflict. During this period, 11,000 rebel fighters were killed, and 80,000 Kikuyu men, women, and children were detained in camps. Additionally, 100 Europeans and 2,000 loyal Africans lost their lives. Eventually, the rebellion's leader, Jomo Kenyatta, was elected prime minister when Kenya gained independence from Britain in 1963.
In the poem, Walcott presents vivid images of the conflict and grapples with the difficulty of choosing sides, as he has both African and European heritage. He cannot support British colonialism nor the Mau Mau's violence, as siding with either would mean rejecting a part of himself.
Lines 1-3:
The opening lines of the poem set the scene on the African plain, or veldt. The
nation is metaphorically compared to an animal, possibly a lion, with a ‘‘tawny
pelt.’’ Tawny, a light brown to brownish-orange color, is common in the African
landscape. The term "Kikuyu" refers to a native tribe in Kenya. What starts as
a serene depiction of the African plain quickly changes; the Kikuyu are likened
to flies buzzing around the ‘‘animal’’ of Africa, feeding on blood that is
abundant enough to form streams.
Lines 4-6:
Walcott dismantles the idyllic image many hold of Africa by portraying a
landscape strewn with bodies. He intensifies the horror by introducing a worm
or maggot that thrives amidst the decaying flesh. The worm's command to "Waste
no compassion on these separate dead!" is perplexing, suggesting that the
victims somehow deserved their fate.
Lines 7-10:
The terms "justify" and "colonial policy," when considered alongside the
previous six lines, clarify that Walcott is referencing the Mau Mau Uprising
against British colonists in Kenya during the 1950s. Initially, the speaker
seems to blame the victims, but he shifts to accusing those who imposed the
colonial system on Kenya, creating division. Their justifications are
meaningless to the "white child" murdered purely because of his race in
retaliation by Mau Mau fighters, or to the "savages," who, in a racist view
akin to Nazi attitudes towards Jews, are seen as worthless or expendable.
"Savages" is a contentious term, originating from the French word
sauvage meaning wild, and is now highly derogatory in English. Walcott
uses "savage" to illustrate the racist perspective of a British
colonialist.
Lines 11-14:
Walcott shifts focus in these lines, returning to images of Africa's wildlife, reminding us that ibises (long-billed wading birds) and other animals inhabited this...
(This entire section contains 959 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
land long before African or European civilizations. The poet describes an ancient hunting tradition where natives walk through tall grass, beating it to flush out prey. This necessary hunting for survival contrasts with the senseless and arbitrary killing between native Africans and European settlers.
Lines 15-21:
These lines convey a pro-nature and anticulture message. Animals kill solely
for food and survival, but humans, having mastered hunting, extend violence to
dominate others and prove superiority, deciding life and death as if seeking
divinity. Ironically, human wars are depicted as following the rhythm of a
drum—an instrument made from animal hide stretched over a cylinder. Walcott
also notes that historically, for whites, peace has not come through compromise
but because the opposition has been crushed and rendered powerless.
Lines 22-25:
These lines are challenging to interpret, but they seem directed at those who
judge the Mau Mau uprising from afar—people who can somehow justify brutality
as necessary and recognize a crisis yet choose not to get involved. The poet
appears to criticize this mindset by drawing a parallel between the Mau Mau
Uprising and the Spanish Civil War (1936-39). Leaders of France and Great
Britain, hoping to avoid another large-scale war in Europe, proposed a
nonintervention pact signed by twenty-seven nations. Despite this, the
Insurgents, or Nationalists, led by General Francisco Franco, received military
support from Germany and Italy. In contrast, the Loyalists, or Republicans,
lacked such backing; they fought bravely but were outnumbered, lost territory,
and were ultimately defeated in March 1939. Line 25 offers a cynical
perspective on the Mau Mau Uprising, portraying it as just another colonial
conflict where 'gorillas'—a derogatory term for Africans—battle 'supermen'—a
negative depiction of Europeans.
Lines 26-33:
This stanza shifts the focus from Africa to the poet himself. Walcott, having
both African and English heritage, feels conflicted and unsure of how to react
to the Mau Mau struggle. He is clearly dissatisfied with the typical outsider's
response. Walcott is appalled by the actions of the Mau Mau just as he is
disgusted by the British. By the stanza's end, the poet's internal conflict
remains unresolved, but it is evident that Walcott refuses to forsake either
Africa or Britain.