Last Updated on September 18, 2019, by eNotes Editorial. Word Count: 382
France's Lack of Military Preparation for War
Most historians have typically believed that France's strategy for the war was based on the Maginot Line. World War I (1914–1918) had demonstrated that fighting on the defensive was more effective than offensive action. Moreover, an offensive strategy is costly in manpower. In addition to the Maginot Line, French strategy included a movement of French troops into Belgium. Sending troops into Belgium required Belgium's cooperation, but Belgium had declared its neutrality in 1936. Belgium's neutrality complicated French planning and contributed to France's defeat.
Jackson accepts a great deal of traditional historical thinking on France's military unpreparedness. However, he stresses that France's army of 1940 was not in worse shape than its army of 1914. Jackson mentions, however, that many French officers started crying after the first few days of battle, indicating that they were psychologically unprepared for the exigencies demanded by the perilous situation. In addition, he criticizes the French for their poor intelligence: French military leaders had no idea that the Ardennes would be the focal point of the German attack.
France's Failure to Secure Military Alliances
Jackson argues that French defeat was partly caused by its inability to obtain diplomatic allies. Both Belgium and the Soviet Union refused French overtures before the war. France tried to make alliances with Czechoslovakia, Romania, and other eastern European nations, but these did not amount to much. Efforts to placate Mussolini's Italy failed, and even Anglo-French relations were problematic. At...
(The entire section contains 382 words.)
Unlock This Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this The Fall of France study guide. You'll get access to all of the The Fall of France content, as well as access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.