Download PDF Print Page Citation Share Link

Last Updated on September 18, 2019, by eNotes Editorial. Word Count: 611

Julian Jackson wrote his historical analysis in an effort to summarize and evaluate numerous different perspectives on the reasons that Germany’s May 1940 invasion of France succeeded so quickly. From that very moment, Jackson notes, opinions have diverged widely as to the military and political reasons that led to this shocking course of events.

Illustration of PDF document

Download The Fall of France Study Guide

Subscribe Now

The debate of the Fall of France has gone on ever since 1940, but now it is at least possible to view the event with greater serenity, and abandon the tone of polemic and accusation . . . There are many strands to the Fall of France: it was a military defeat, the collapse of a political system, the breakdown of an alliance between two countries, and in its final stages, almost the complete disintegration of a country.

One reason that France was less prepared than it could have been was that the attack came much sooner than expected. As Germany was poised to invade Poland in August 1939, France’s Commander-in-Chief, General Gamelin, was among those who assumed that the German military would be fully occupied to the east. Rather than expect that Germany would mount substantial attacks to the west as well, Gamelin’s main strategy was to prepare to attack Germany. Should they attack, he believed the existing defenses would be adequate. (Gamelin, notably, was later replaced by General Weygand.)

His [Gamelin's] strategy was to prepare for a long war (guerre de longue durée). The French with their British allies would asphyxiate the German economy with a blockade, while at the same time building up their armed forces in order to be able to mount an offensive in 1941 or 1942. Ultimately, it was believed, the superior economic potential of the Allies would give them the military advantage; meanwhile, they were defensively prepared to meet any German challenge.

The French had done their utmost to coordinate with Belgium, Jackson is convinced, but this coordination was bogged down when Belgium assumed a position of neutrality. This left the Maginot Line—originally established in World War I—vulnerable. When the German invasion began, the French defenses along the Belgian border had a temporary effect. Instead, the main attack occurred near Sedan.

While affirming the importance of the oft-noted German military advantage, Jackson points out that superiority was not just in numbers or kind of tanks and planes. One key area that contributed to German superiority was communications via...

(The entire section contains 611 words.)

Unlock This Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this The Fall of France study guide. You'll get access to all of the The Fall of France content, as well as access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

  • Summary
  • Themes
  • Characters
  • Analysis
  • Quotes
Start your 48-Hour Free Trial