Summary
In 1848, James Russell Lowell's A Fable for Critics made its debut, arriving amidst a flourishing period in American literature. It appeared three years after Edgar Allan Poe's famed poem "The Raven" and slightly before Herman Melville's Moby Dick. At twenty-nine, Lowell was carving out his niche as a poet and antislavery advocate, emerging alongside literary giants like Melville and Whitman.
An American Literary Awakening
In the era of Ralph Waldo Emerson and Nathaniel Hawthorne, Lowell was convinced that American literature had matured significantly. His convictions are articulated in a section of A Fable for Critics, echoing Emerson’s call to arms in “The American Scholar” and foreshadowing Whitman’s groundbreaking preface to the 1855 edition of Leaves of Grass. Lowell encouraged American writers to "Forget Europe wholly," advocating for a distinct literary identity.
Satirical Insights
Today, A Fable for Critics is often recognized for its sharp satire, though it is seldom read in its entirety. Lowell cheerfully parades his contemporaries—figures like Emerson, Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, and John Greenleaf Whittier—through his witty verses. With youthful audacity, he penned memorable barbs: "There comes Poe, with his raven, like Barnaby Rudge,/ Three-fifths of him genius and two-fifths sheer fudge." On James Fenimore Cooper, he mused, "the women he draws from one model don’t vary,/ All sappy as maples and flat as a prairie."
Critiques and Challenges
Despite Lowell's astute observations, the poem has its flaws. It lacks the structured elegance of Alexander Pope’s essays in verse, instead meandering through caricatures. The reputations of many targets have waned, rendering some satire obsolete. Furthermore, the anapestic tetrameter and awkward rhymes, such as "philosopher" with "loss of her," test readers' patience, even within its comical context.
Structural Concerns
Lowell's approach to structure is cumbersome, taking a lengthy route to deliver his satire. The poem depicts American writers marching past Phoebus Apollo, who appears indifferent to their parade. These authors manifest as a cacophony of fowls led by "Tityrus Griswold"—a nod to the contemporary anthologist Rufus W. Griswold. This mechanical framework lacks excitement and direction.
Literary Influences and Legacy
Lowell drew inspiration from prior literary satires, such as Pope’s The Dunciad, Lord Byron’s English Bards and Scotch Reviewers, and Leigh Hunt’s The Feast of the Poets. His own work would later inspire Amy Lowell’s Critical Fable in 1922, highlighting its enduring influence.
"Con Amore" Satire
Lowell wrote his satire "con amore," as he described with evident enthusiasm on the title page and introduction. The wordy title page, imitating an antiquated book style, cleverly begins his rhymed couplets: “Reader! walk up at once (it will soon be too late), and buy at a perfectly ruinous rate A Fable for Critics.” In the introductory rhyme, Lowell candidly sets limits, calling the work a "trifle" and "neither good verse nor bad prose." He added a longer rhymed essay to the second edition, reflecting on the mixed critical response.
Narrative and Fabular Devices
The poem is narrated by Lowell himself, but the first notable character is Phoebus Apollo, drawn from Greek mythology. This device, a favorite among fabulists, allows Lowell to add humor and perspective by using otherworldly settings and characters to critique his contemporaries.
A Procession of Literary Figures
Under a laurel, Apollo laments the lackluster recent poetry and muses about writing anew. When his aide fetches a lily to stir Apollo's creativity, Evert Augustus Duyckinck, an editor and critic, approaches. He is depicted as a reputation-conscious mutterer. As Apollo and Duyckinck spar verbally, the procession of authors begins, led by Ralph Waldo Emerson, already celebrated for his essays. Emerson, described as "a Greek...
(This entire section contains 910 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
head on right Yankee shoulders," is praised for his "sharp common sense." Following are William Ellery Channing and Henry David Thoreau, who merely gather Emerson’s "windfalls."
More Literary Portraits
Bronson Alcott and Orestes Brownson follow. Alcott, an idealist, avoids practicalities, "never a fact to perplex him or bore him," while Brownson, a religious convert, pens "transparent and forcible prose." Lowell’s satire is balanced with praise, especially when deserved.
Satire and Acclaim
Nathaniel Parker Willis is depicted as frivolous yet charming, while Theodore Parker's radicalism and sermons are lampooned. William Cullen Bryant, though not a Wordsworth, maintains dignity "as an iceberg." John Greenleaf Whittier, a pacifist with a "torrent of verse," earns commendation for his human rights advocacy, leading Apollo to extol all poets who champion the oppressed.
Minor and Major Figures
Next are Richard Henry Dana, Sr., John Neal, and Nathaniel Hawthorne, the latter receiving unreserved praise as "fully and perfectly man." James Fenimore Cooper’s repetitive characters are critiqued, though his boldness is acknowledged. Apollo uses Cooper's example to urge Americans towards literary independence from England.
Concluding Remarks
After a jab at slavery, Miranda (Margaret Fuller) interrupts, leading to a tangent on societal bores. The parade continues with Charles Frederick Briggs, then shifts to Poe, illustrating "mind over heart." Lastly, praise for Longfellow's enduring work surfaces.
Final Reflections
Lowell returns for a tribute to Massachusetts, celebrating its industrial spirit and artistic contributions. Apollo resumes, appreciating Oliver Wendell Holmes before Lowell himself appears, "striving Parnassus to climb." The procession ends with minor figures, and Apollo humorously derides their self-importance.
As the searchers return, Apollo offers final thoughts on criticism, lamenting how it stifles creativity: "He who would write and can’t write can surely review." Even as Apollo rages against this, Miranda again intrudes, prompting Apollo and Lowell to withdraw, bringing the satire to a swift close.