Characters Discussed

(Great Characters in Literature)

Inspector Rogas

Inspector Rogas, an investigator, the protagonist. His intelligence and his culture set him apart from the other members of the police force. He is thorough and persistent in his investigation, examining each event or piece of evidence with patience. His search for the assassin, assigned to him by his superiors, extends beyond the execution of his duties; it becomes for him an intellectual and personal challenge as he realizes the cleverness of his opponent. The investigation carries him dangerously close to truths that are best left undiscovered, and he meets with strong opposition to his exposing them.


Cres, the supposed assassin. Although he plays a central role, he is glimpsed only once. He is elusive, mysterious, and virtually untraceable; in short, he is very present yet invisible. Most important, he is clever and calculating, able to predict what the police’s next move will be and to evade it. Like Rogas, he is exact and thorough in his work; if he is indeed the assassin, he leaves no trace.


Nocio, a writer. Dramatic and sarcastic, he speaks openly and readily about his troubles. He is embittered and resentful at the low regard in which his books are held by the fashionable revolutionaries. After having thought of himself as a revolutionary in his country, he believes that he is now being displaced by a young class of pseudointellectuals, who spew...

(The entire section is 541 words.)

The Characters

(Literary Essentials: World Fiction)

The characters of Equal Danger are virtual abstractions. Except for Rogas, from whose point of view the story unfolds, the politicians and would-be reformers are mere parodies of corruption and ineptitude.

Inspector Rogas, whose surname derives from the Latin verb, rogare, “to ask,” is an honest philosopher-cop who seeks the truth but whose interrogations lead only to more questions. He is well read, sensitive, and sympathetic. The reader is told, in fact, that Rogas is a man of principles in a country where no one else believes in them anymore.

His principles lead him to ask questions that the Government finds embarrassing. Though he follows orders, he does so only out of a professional sense of duty. Like all good philosophers, Rogas is not far from the truth even when he seems to be sidetracked. Despite impediments, his investigations take him inevitably closer to the real assassin, Cres.

Significantly, the character around whom the plot revolves is unseen—or only briefly, in disguise. This elusiveness, a virtual invisibility, is a crucial aspect of the meaning of the plot. The other characters doubt Cres’s guilt. They are thus unable or unwilling to recognize or believe in the truth. Cres’s name literally suggests “credibility.” Though the real assassin, he is ultimately let alone, ignored, even patronized. He becomes the agent, a sort of angel of death, wreaking havoc on society.

The characters of Equal Danger are thus not flesh-and-blood human beings but representations, analogues of certain destructive attitudes toward justice. The two suspects whom Rogas interviews at the beginning of the novel, for example, depict what happens to ordinary men who come up against the injustice of the court system: They become cynical, despairing, frightened creatures who sit mindlessly in the sun.

Galano, Nocio, the ministers of state, even President Riches, are not shown as individuals but as stereotypes—the intellectuals, the bourgeoisie, the corrupt and inept government officials. Each has his views about the political structure of society, but none can act to save it without being corrupted by it.


(Great Characters in Literature)

Cannon, JoAnn. “The Detective Fiction of Leonardo Sciascia,” in Modern Fiction Studies. XXIX (Autumn, 1983), pp. 523-534.

Jones, Verina. “Leonardo Sciascia,” in Writers and Society in Contemporary Italy: A Collection of Essays, 1984. Edited by Michael Caesar and Peter Hainsworth.

Prescott, P.S. Review in Newsweek. LXXXII (July 16, 1973), p. 88.

Vidal, Gore. “Sciascia’s Italy,” in The Second American Revolution and Other Essays, 1976-1982, 1982.