Emily Mann Criticism

Emily Mann, born in 1952, is an influential American playwright and director renowned for her documentary-style theater, which addresses pressing social and political issues such as war and political assassination. Her "theater of testimony" approach engages audiences with challenging, often painful subjects, compelling them to confront complex realities. Among her acclaimed works, Still Life and Execution of Justice stand out for their exploration of the Vietnam War's psychological toll and the controversial trial of Dan White, respectively. As noted in When Reality Takes to the Stage, Mann's works often blend interviews, transcripts, and performance elements to create a layered narrative structure. This technique has been praised by critics like Michael Feingold, who described Still Life as an unforgettable piece of dramatic art, according to his review Home Fronts. However, some critics, such as John Simon and Robert Brustein, find fault in her methods, citing issues like lack of engagement or excessive direction. Despite these mixed reviews, Mann's work continues to be celebrated for its emotional resonance and ability to shed light on important societal issues, as exemplified by Execution of Justice, which was praised for its compelling courtroom drama and social critique.

Contents

  • Principal Works
  • Author Commentary
  • Still Life
    • Home Fronts
    • Various Ways to Lose Your Head
    • Still Life
    • A Theater Marking Time
    • Bottles of Violence: Fragments of Vietnam in Emily Mann's Still Life
  • Execution Of Justice
    • When Reality Takes to the Stage
    • Execution of Justice
    • Murder Most Foul
    • Execution of Justice
    • Execution of Justice
    • From Black and White to Red and Pink: Political Themes on the American Jewish Stage
  • Further Reading