Student Question
Were Lincoln's instructions to the freed people in the Emancipation Proclamation realistic?
Quick answer:
Lincoln's instructions to freed people in the Emancipation Proclamation were partly realistic. Advising freed slaves to avoid violence was feasible, as they had limited means for revenge. However, expecting them to work for wages was unrealistic, as Southern states, engaged in war, were unlikely to recognize their freedom or pay them. The Proclamation required enforcement through war and constitutional amendments, like the Thirteenth Amendment, to effectively abolish slavery and empower Congress to enforce these changes.
Part of Lincoln's instructions were realistic and part were not. Overall, Lincoln told the freed slaves two things. Here is the quote:
And I hereby enjoin upon the people so declared to be free to abstain from all violence, unless in necessary self-defence; and I recommend to them that, in all cases when allowed, they labor faithfully for reasonable wages.
I would argue that the first part was realistic while the second was not.
It was realistic to tell the freed slaves not to be violent. The slaves were probably not in position to do much in the way of taking violent revenge against their former masters. In addition, it would be completely possible (if perhaps difficult) to simply leave without feeling the need to take revenge.
However, it would have been practically impossible for the ex-slaves to work for wages. The idea that the Southerners, still in the middle of the war, would accept the idea that the slaves were free and start paying them wages is ridiculous.
What were freed individuals supposed to do after the Emancipation Proclamation? Were Lincoln’s instructions realistic?
The Emancipation Proclamation was a combination of what we might today call an executive order and an action pursuant to Lincoln's authority as commander in chief. Did the slave states immediately cease and desist? Of course not. And Lincoln, while he might have hoped his proclamation would be enough, certainly knew that was not likely. In order for this proclamation to be effectuated, a war had to be fought.
A Constitutional amendment was passed immediately after the Civil War, the Thirteenth Amendment, which prohibited slavery, and which also gave Congress the authority to pass laws to effectuate the amendment. Once we were no longer a nation at war, it was clear that the southern states would do everything they could to perpetuate slavery or at least would make life difficult or impossible for former slaves, and if we were no longer at war, a president would have no authority as commander in chief to enforce a proclamation. Hence, we needed to add to the Constitution to outlaw slavery and to give Congress the authority to pass laws to outlaw it and to enforce those laws. There was nothing in the original Constitution that gave Congress such authority. The series of amendments that followed were also designed to give Congress the ability to pass laws that would render illegal many of the subsequent actions taken by the southern states against the former slaves.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.