Other Literary Forms
Although known primarily as a playwright, Ed Bullins has also worked in forms ranging from fiction and the essay to the “revolutionary television commercial.” His novel The Reluctant Rapist (1973) focuses on the early experience of Steve Benson, a semiautobiographical character who appears in several plays, including In New England Winter, The Duplex, and The Fabulous Miss Marie. The Hungered Ones: Early Writings (1971), a collection of Bullins’s early stories and essays, some of which are loosely autobiographical, provides an overview of his early perspective. Active as an editor and a theorist throughout his career, Bullins has written introductions to anthologies such as The New Lafayette Theater Presents (1974) and New Plays from the Black Theatre (1969). Along with the introduction to his own collection The Theme Is Blackness, these introductions provide a powerful and influential theoretical statement on the aesthetics and politics of the African American theater during the late 1960’s and early 1970’s. The Theme Is Blackness also contains scripts for “rituals” and mixed-media productions, including “Black Revolutionary Commercials,” which reflect the concern with electronic media visible in many of his later plays.
Achievements
Ed Bullins won the 1968 Vernon Rice Award for The Electronic Nigger, the 1971 Obie Award for In New England Winter and The Fabulous Miss Marie, and in 1975 both the Obie and the New York Drama Critics Circle Award for The Taking of Miss Janie. In 1997 he received the Living Legend Award from the Black Theatre Conference, and in 1999 he won the August Wilson Playwriting Award and the Garland Anderson Playwright Award. He has also received grants from the Guggenheim Foundation (1971, 1976), the Rockefeller Foundation (1968, 1970, 1973), the Creative Artists Program Service (1973), the Black Arts Alliance (1971), and the National Endowment for the Arts (1974).
As much as any contemporary American playwright, Bullins has forged a powerful synthesis of avant-garde technique and revolutionary commitment challenging easy preconceptions concerning the relationship between politics and aesthetics. Like Latin American writers Carlos Fuentes and Gabriel García Márquez and African writers Ngugi wa Thiong’o and Wole Soyinka, Bullins sees no inherent contradiction between the use of experimental techniques and the drive to reach a mass audience alienated from the dominant social/economic/racial hierarchy. Separating himself from the cultural elite that has claimed possession of the modernist and postmodernist tradition, Bullins adapts the tradition to the frames of reference and to the immediate concerns of his audience, primarily but not exclusively within the African American community. Although he frequently comments on and revises the philosophical and aesthetic concerns of European American modernism, he does so to clarify his audience’s vision of an American culture riddled by psychological and political contradictions that intimate the need for a basic change.
Paralleling the political modernism advocated by Bertolt Brecht in his aesthetic and political debate with György Lukács, Bullins’s synthesis takes on particular significance in the context of the Black Arts movement of the late 1960’s. As a leading figure in the movement for specifically black cultural institutions and modes of expression, Bullins refuted through example the casual stereotypes of black revolutionary artists as ideologically inflexible and aesthetically naïve. Although he supports the confrontational strategies of radical playwrights committed to what he calls the “dialectic of change,” he works primarily within what he calls the “dialectic of experience,” which entails a sophisticated confrontation with a “reality” he understands to be in large part shaped by individual perceptions. Drawing on Brecht, Jean Genet, Albert Camus, Amiri Baraka, Eugene O’Neill, John Cage, Anton Chekhov, and Langston Hughes with equal facility, Bullins is not primarily a literary dramatist or a political...
(This entire section contains 764 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
agitator. Rather, he is a playwright in the classic sense, concerned above all with bringing the experience of black Americans alive onstage in a manner that forces the audience to confront its metaphorically ambiguous but politically explosive implications. His most successful plays, such asIn New England Winter and The Taking of Miss Janie, demonstrate conclusively that a revolutionary artist does not need to circumscribe his vision in order to defend a preestablished ideological position. Demonstrating his affinities with Brechtian theory as opposed to Brechtian practice, Bullins creates tensions between presentation style and content to alienate his audience, white or black, from its assumptions concerning race, class, sex, and ultimately the nature of perception.
Not surprisingly, this challenge frequently disturbs mainstream audiences and critics; typical is the response of Walter Kerr, who complained in a review of The Taking of Miss Janie that “no one likes having to finish—or trying to finish—an author’s play for him; but that’s the effort asked here.” Ironically, Kerr’s criticism accurately identifies the reason for Bullins’s success in contexts ranging from the black community theaters of San Francisco and New York to the La Mama theater in New York’s SoHo district. Challenging the audience to confront the experience presented rather than to accept a mediated statement about that experience, Bullins rarely presents didactic statements without substantial ironic qualification. By refusing to advance simple solutions or to repress his awareness of oppression, Bullins attempts to force the audience to internalize and act on its responses. Effective as literature as well as theater, Bullins’s plays have won numerous awards and grants from both African American and European American organizations. The best of them, especially the early sections of the Twentieth Century Cycle, a projected twenty-play series, have led some critics to compare Bullins with O’Neill. Although his ultimate stature depends in large part on the development of the cycle and his continuing ability to generate new forms in response to changing audiences and political contexts, Bullins’s place in the history of American and African American theater seems assured.
Bibliography
Bigsby, C. W. E. The Second Black Renaissance: Essays in Black Literature. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1980. A strong chapter, “Black Drama: The Public Voice,” includes a protracted discussion of Bullins’s work as “a moving spirit behind the founding of another black theatre institution, the New Lafayette Theatre.” Index.
DeGaetani, John L. A Search for a Postmodern Theater: Interviews with Contemporary Playwrights. New York: Greenwood Press, 1991. After writing more than fifty plays, Bullins still admires Samuel Beckett and still deals with the theme of “the breakdown of communications among loved ones, and misunderstanding among good intentions.” Contains an excellent update of his activities and a strong discussion of the themes of rape in his work.
Hay, Samuel A. Ed Bullins: A Literary Biography. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1997. Despite the title, Hay’s “biography” contains few biographical details and really focuses on Bullins’s many (more than one hundred) dramas, which he examines in some detail. The book, which was written with Bullins’s approval, provides readers with the social, political, and intellectual context in which the plays were written. Hay includes an exhaustive bibliography, which helps to resolve some issues about the dates the plays were written, produced, and published. It is the only full-length treatment of Bullins’s work.
Hay, Samuel A. “Structural Elements in Ed Bullins’s Plays.” In The Theater of Black Americans, edited by Errol Hill. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. Examines structural consistencies in The Duplex but adds valuable comments on earlier works. Begins with Walter Kerr’s review, comparing his remarks with Bullins’s structural elements, such as “desultory conversation,” “unplanned and casual action,” and “frequently disconnected dialogue.” Compares Bullins’s work with Anton Chekhov’s Tri Sestry (pr., pb. 1901; Three Sisters, 1920).
Herman, William. Understanding Contemporary American Drama. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1987. A long chapter on Bullins, “The People in This Play Are Black,” details his major plays to 1984. Good biographical sketch of Bullins’s New Lafayette connections, including his editorship of Black Theatre, the theater company’s journal.
Sanders, Leslie Catherine. The Development of Black Theater in America: From Shadows to Selves. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1988. Sanders devotes a lengthy chapter of the book to Bullins. The focus is on Bullins’s work for the New Lafayette productions in New York and on some of his major plays: The Taking of Miss Janie, A Son, Come Home, The Electronic Nigger, In the Wine Time, Goin’ a Buffalo, and Clara’s Ole Man.
Williams, Mance. Black Theatre in the 1960’s and 1970’s: A Historical-Critical Analysis of the Movement. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1985. By concentrating on theater movements rather than on the playwright, this study underlines Bullins’s strong administrative and inspirational contributions to the African American theater experience. Includes discussion of his literary style, use of music, views on street theater, and relationship with the New Lafayette Theater. Index and bibliography.