Dry Themes

The main themes in Dry are loss of humanity, survival of the fittest, and gun violence.

  • Loss of humanity: Through the Tap-Out and “water-zombies,” Dry explores the “Three Days to Animal” theory, which states that people revert to an animalistic state three days after civilization collapses.
  • Survival of the fittest: While several characters subscribe to a “survival of the fittest” ideology, the novel proposes that it is teamwork rather than individual strength that best ensures survival.
  • Gun violence: Several of the characters in Dry have a complicated relationship with gun use, which both offers protection and incurs dire consequences during the crisis.

Loss of Humanity

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

The central appeal of Dry lies in its exploration of what would happen if people were deprived of one of their most valuable resources: water. Since the novel offers hypothetical scenarios of the collapse of modern society, it follows that one of its most prevalent themes is a loss of humanity. This is because the conception of humanity is so intertwined with that of law and civilization. In the novel, different characters find themselves desperate to do anything to survive—even kill one another. In fact, this is what Henry does when he trades the truck’s keys for a sip of water, thereby condemning Alyssa and the others to certain death. He rationalizes his actions by telling himself that the rules of survival dictate that he must put himself first. Values and virtues associated with humanity—such as lawfulness, sympathy, and cooperation—are therefore discarded in favor of a more ruthless code of ethics.

The first time Alyssa witnesses this loss of humanity is when she tries to rescue a defenseless man from three water-crazed teenagers who wish to rob him. While she is shocked at their brutality and lawlessness, she soon finds this instance to be only the first of many. Kelton tries to explain the teenagers’ actions to her using the social theory known as “Three Days to Animal,” which states that it takes only three days for humans to descend into animal primitiveness following the collapse of civilization. This theory is further proven correct when their neighbors—people they were previously on friendly terms with—storm and raid the McCrackens’ house for water. Extreme scarcity robs people of their humanity by reducing them to mere bodily needs and functions.

Loss of humanity is also apparent in the novel’s vocabulary, as desperately thirsty civilians are referred to as “water-zombies.” These water-zombies are described as weak-looking, with washed-out skin and emptiness in their eyes. Severe dehydration has left them concerned solely with survival.

In the end, the novel asserts that one may never regain one’s humanity once one has lost it. Even when water is again found freely and modern civilization is reinstated, Alyssa reveals the existence of “shadows”—people who look and act like wraiths of their former selves. Having forsaken their humanity during the Tap-Out by committing depraved and immoral acts, they have a difficult time returning to their normal lives. They find themselves haunted by guilt and shame. It is clear, therefore, that extreme crisis is a test of moral fiber—one that makes a person question if their survival is worth their humanity.

Survival of the Fittest

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Kelton McCracken’s father, Richard, divides people into three categories: sheep, wolves, and herders. While sheep are the blind majority who simply follow the herd, wolves are dishonest lawbreakers who pretend to be sheep in order to take advantage of their naiveté and ignorance. Meanwhile, herders are the capable few who choose to guide the sheep instead of prey on them. Although the two are on opposite ends of the moral spectrum, both wolves and herders subscribe to the “survival of the fittest” ideology. Both believe that individual strength and intelligence is the key to survival.

As the Tap-Out transforms California into an urban wilderness, it follows that “survival of the fittest” takes over as the dominant social order. The characters who embrace this ideology are Kelton, Henry, and Jacqui. While Kelton sees himself as a herder, however, Henry and Jacqui are no doubt wolves. Both of them have no qualms with breaking the law and putting their needs above others’. Henry’s strength lies in his excellent negotiation skills, while...

(This entire section contains 305 words.)

Unlock this Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

Jacqui’s lies in her street smarts. The main difference between the two, however, is that while Jacqui ultimately learns to take care of others as well as herself, Henry does not.

Even though the novel demonstrates cases of “survival of the fittest,” it is clear that it does not itself subscribe to this ideology, as it establishes outliers such as Charity and her commune. Even Alyssa, Garrett, Kelton, and Jacqui do not survive by being the smartest, strongest, or most ruthless—rather, they survive through teamwork and mutual responsibility, having learned to look out for each other. Survival is something they could not have accomplished on their own. Through this, the novel invites its readers to reconsider the meaning behind “survival of the fittest”—and if people are truly strongest alone or together.

Gun Violence

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

At the beginning of the novel, Alyssa sees guns as evil—it is revealed that she has even marched against them. However, after witnessing the lawlessness that has overtaken their environment, she agrees to let Kelton carry a gun to protect the group. In the third act of the novel, she even carries a gun herself after almost being kidnapped and sexually assaulted by a stranger. Finally, Alyssa’s relationship with firearms comes to a climax when she almost pulls the trigger on Garrett in order to save him from dying from thirst. It is clear that Alyssa sees gun violence only as a last resort—otherwise, it has no place in civilized society.

Another character who has a complex relationship with gun violence is Richard McCracken, Kelton’s father. As a survivalist, Richard believes in taking every necessary precaution in protecting oneself. He even gives Kelton a gun of his own and trains him in how to use it. However, Richard soon learns that one can be betrayed by the false sense of security guns bring. One of the most significant moments of the novel is when Richard McCracken fires at Brady, thinking him to be a dangerous home intruder. Because of the misjudgment that he is fully capable of exacting personal justice, Richard ends up murdering his eldest son. In the end, it is revealed that Richard has disposed of every one of his guns—one of the many ways in which he pays for his mistakes.

In the closing chapter, Alyssa remarks that she hopes the gun she almost used on Garrett, Kelton, and herself was destroyed. This is one of the ways in which the novel marks a return to civilization, as Alyssa once again sees gun violence as both harmful and obsolete. The novel neither condemns nor advocates for gun use; rather, guns are made to symbolize human agency, for better or for worse. In a landscape of lawlessness and disorder, gun violence becomes a desperate bid for control.

Previous

Chapter Summaries

Next

Characters

Loading...