society which was simultaneously becoming less religious and experiencing rapid technological change.

The first moral issue the reader encounters is that of whether scientific advances that offer easy ways to change our natures are fundamentally problematic. Dr. Jekyll is essentially trying to make himself a better person by use of drugs rather than self-discipline and moral effort. This shortcut does not turn out well and is prescient in the way it anticipates the issues people now face with the developments of many psychoactive drugs and genetic modification. Essentially, it suggests that taking shortcuts without considering consequences can result in morally bad outcomes.

Next, the character of Mr. Utterson confronts readers with the question of whether moral neutrality is possible. In many ways, Utterson is a character who exemplifies an even more pure scientific detachment than Jekyll, preferring to observe than to act. Eventually, though, he both exemplifies and realizes that inaction can be as immoral as action and that to stand by as evil happens is to be complicit in it.

There are any number of moral messages in The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr.Hyde, but one of the most prominent is that we shouldn't take people at face value. As always, it's their moral character, not their outward appearance that really matters.

Take Dr. Jekyll, for example. On the outside, he's the very epitome of respectability; an educated, socially-prominent man, he's the last person anyone would suspect of carrying out such foul, wicked deeds. But therein lies the problem. People attach so much importance to outward appearance that they don't realize what may be going on beneath the prim and proper exterior of the social elite.

An additional moral message to consider is that one shouldn't suppress one's inner emotions as so many people in Victorian England did. If one were a psychoanalyst, one might argue that Mr. Hyde is the inevitable result, the hideous by-product, of Dr. Jekyll's chronic inability to deal with the myriad disturbances buried deep within his subconscious. Dr. Jekyll is unwilling or unable to deal with his complexes (and at the same time is no longer able to repress them), and they've exploded out of him in a volcanic eruption of murderous hatred and evil.

The moral message throughout The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde concerns the value in controlling one's inherently wicked tendencies. Throughout the story, Robert Louis Stevenson explores the duality of human nature via Dr. Jekyll's struggle to destroy the evil side of his personality. In Dr. Jekyll's attempt to rid himself of his wicked nature, he develops a potion that is supposed to split his personalities into two. However, Dr. Jekyll discovers that there is no foolproof way to separate a person's good and bad qualities completely. As the reader learns, no one can truly conquer their inherently wicked nature, but there is hope in controlling one's impulses. According to Christian theology, man is born into sin and is inherently wicked; however, there is hope in gaining salvation through believing in and following Jesus Christ. A significant part of Christianity and other religions relies on tenets that influence individuals to control their desires and wicked impulses. As Dr. Jekyll discovers, unrestrained evil can have disastrous results.

The moral message of Robert Louis Stevenson's The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is that man's soul is paired with both elements of good and evil. These basic elements cannot be separated because man is defined by the conflict within his inner nature and how he deals with this duality.

In his statement Dr. Jekyll acknowledges that this duality exists.

I was no more myself when I laid aside restraint and plunged in shame, than when I labored...at the furtherance of knowledge or the relief of sorrow and suffering....With every day, and from both sides of my intelligence,...I thus drew steadily nearer to that truth...that man is not truly one, but truly two. (Ch.10)

The scientist Dr. Jekyll is so tempted that he experiments with separating his evil nature from the good. However, in this attempt to remove the troublesome part of his nature, Jekyll eventually discovers that without goodness to temper this intrinsic evil in human nature, man is overcome by his lower elements. This separated lower element of Dr. Jekyll, whom he calls Mr. Hyde, commits evil for pleasure, and in the new freedom of separation, the acts of evil become more and more egregious. Eventually, this evil nature overtakes Jekyll's better self, and he is destroyed.

One moral message of The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is that it is necessary for the individual to wrestle with his or her own dark side; there is no shortcut or easy way to escape having to do this.  When Dr. Jekyll tries to separate his dark side, the side of him that wants to engage in immoral or unethical behavior, from his good side, he finds that -- over time -- he begins to lose control over the evil part of himself.  It becomes more and more powerful, and he can no longer fight it successfully.  He had been hoping to destroy this side of himself and find an easy way to avoid having to struggle with it.  He learns, too late, that the struggle would have been far better than attempting to rid himself entirely of the darkness.  This makes it seem as though such darkness is actually a fundamental part of every individual and that there is value in learning to control one's sinful or evil impulses.

Although The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson addresses moral issues, one of the characteristics that makes it a major literary work rather than a didactic essay or sermon is that it does not offer a simplistic message but instead makes the reader think about complex moral issues.

The first moral issue in question is the relationship of ethics to technology. The novella was written in a period of dramatic advances in medical science. Jekyll is essentially attempting to use medical technology to become a better person. The work challenges us to consider whether changes in character brought about by taking medicines are really moral, in so far as the medicine is making moral choices for the patient rather than the patient exercising his own free will. While Jekyll's medication ultimately has unanticipated side effects leading his Hyde persona to murder, the initial question of whether a drug can really make us moral or immoral is one that still challenges readers as medicine continues to advance.

Another major moral question is raised by the character of Mr. Utterson. He is someone who prefers to remain on the sidelines as a detached observer. He raises the problem of whether inaction is itself morally culpable. Although he does not commit any bad act, he does commit what Christians (n.b. Stevenson himself was raised as a Christian) would term "sins of omission." Towards the end of the novella Utterson assumes responsibility for his moral duty to act, suggesting that because humans live within social systems, one cannot really be an innocent bystander and that absence of positive action is as morally problematic as immoral action.

The story of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde illustrates the fact that all human beings are a mixture of good and evil in their characters. That is why the story has retained its popularity for so many years. Edgar Allan Poe (1809-1849) was one of the first writers to use this theme in short stories like "The Black Cat," "The Cask of Amontillado," and many others. Nathaniel Hawthorne (1804-1864) also used this theme in stories like "Young Goodman Brown," and many others. Robert Louis Stevenson (1850-1894) published"The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" in 1886. He was obviously influenced by both Poe and Hawthorne. In Stevenson's story the righteous, idealistic Dr. Jekyll is trying to rid himself of the dark side of his character, but he finds that Mr. Hyde, who represents all that is wicked and animalistic in himself, is an inescapable part of his character. We are all mixtures of good and evil. We all have a dark side and a light side, at least according to Stevenson, Poe, Hawthorne and others. The well-brought-up English boys who turn into savages in William Golding's "The Lord of the Flies" (1954) are another example of the same truth. Stevenson was probably half successful in getting nis message across, because some people will accept the fact that they are not as good as they would like others to think they are, while other people will not accept it. The story raises a question which each reader must ask himself or herself. Is there a Mr. Hyde in all of us?

Robert Louis Stevenson was a well-known writer in his day. Many Americans owned complete sets of his writings, which included fiction, essays, travel books, and poetry. Today he is best remembered for "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" because this story, which came to him as an inspiration, is based on a truth about human nature which every reader can recognize in himself or herself. Humans are a mixture of good and evil, but most try to present a "persona" to the world of an honest, civilized, generous man or woman.

Nathaniel Hawthorne and Edgar Allan Poe were among the first authors to deal with the dark side of humanity.  Robert Louis Stevenson came considerably later and was influenced by both of these American writers. Like Hawthorne and Poe, Stevenson saw the dramatic possibilities in this duality of human nature, including the fact that people will try to hide, repress, or deny the darker side. Dr. Jekyll had the mistaken notion that he could use science to eliminate the evil side of his nature. He was also mistaken in believing that this dark component was much smaller than it actually turned out to be.