Analysis
Among Tyler’s many works, Dinner at the Homesick Restaurant has received the most critical attention. Her technique of multiple points of view is in the tradition of stream-of-consciousness fiction but is more readable than earlier writers who used the technique, such as Faulkner. She also writes in the tradition of the American Southern writers in her focus on the family as a metaphor for society; however, she departs from the usual Southern practice of using the decline of the family as a metaphor for the fall of the South. In this novel, the family is her subject matter.
The technique of multiple points of view indicates that character is far more important than plot in this particular novel. Tyler’s other novels are more conventional in form and have clearer chronological narratives. For this reason, any analysis of Dinner at the Homesick Restaurant needs to examine how Tyler effectively combines varying points of view, memory, and metaphor to present characters and relationships.
A unifying device in the novel is the use of a specific event or image from the past, presented from the point of view of each of the major characters. Probably the most interesting and intriguing of these scenes is a childhood archery incident in which Cody, aiming an arrow at Ezra, pierces his mother in the shoulder. During the course of the novel, each character tells a quite different version of what happened—but each tells the truth from his or her own perspective. This scene can serve as an illustration of how the novel works as a whole.
Pearl blames her husband, Beck, for the accident that injured her. She recalls that Cody shot the arrow, but that fact was incidental. Instead, she sees what happened as typical of Beck’s thoughtlessness, if not his deliberate intention. When she becomes ill with an infection from the arrow, Beck is away on another trip, and she must go to the doctor alone.
Beck recalls the incident as the one that was...
(The entire section is 816 words.)