What is the irony in "The Destructors"?

Quick answer:

The irony of "The Destructors" is that the boys hurt and diminish their own lives when they destroy the beautiful house that survived the Blitz.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The irony in "The Destructors" is that the teenaged boys in the story destroy what is left of the beauty of the world around them rather than using their energy and talent to preserve and improve it. In destroying the lovely, architecturally significant home in their neighborhood that has survived the Blitz, they further impoverish their own lives.

It is clear that the home's owner, Old Misery, is trying to reach out to boys and build community. For example, he gives them three packets of chocolate. Rationing still went on in 1950s Britain, and chocolate was not necessarily easy to come by, but Old Misery makes the gesture. He is willing to share with the boys what he has.

But the boys are suspicious of his gift:

The gang were puzzled and perturbed by this action and tried to explain it away. “Bet someone dropped them and he picked ’em up,” somebody suggested.

Rather than see it as a kind gesture, the boys take it as a way to "bribe" them into not bouncing a ball against the side of his house. They bounce the ball to show they can't be bribed.

Ironically, if the boys had forged a relationship with the past that Old Misery represents, they all could have helped each other forge a path of creation; however, for them the world is entirely a material place, devoid of the spiritual, and they reject the beauty and graciousness that Old Misery's house represents. Greene implies that this lack of respect for the past is as destructive to England as the Blitz once was.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What's ironic in Graham Greene's short story "The Destructors"?

It would seem that Graham Greene expresses in his story, "The Destructors" that the greatest irony of the World War II Blitz on London is that the children of this era do not find destruction as an aberration. Rather, it seems to them the norm.  This is why the boys who are lead, significantly, by an architect's son, imitate what has occurred to buildings throughout their city; for Old Misery's house to be standing seems somehow wrong to them. Their act of taking the house apart in such an ingenious way is, in effect, an inverse form of architecture, a deconstruction.

Streaks of light came in through the closed shutters where they worked with the seriousness of creators--and destruction after all is a form of creation. A kind of imagination had seen this house as it had now become.

The underlying climate of war is present in the descriptions:

  • "They squatted in the ruins of the room...." Later, "the doors were all off,,,the furniture pillaged and ripped and smashed...."
  • "...the slow warm drops that had begun to fall and the rumble of thunder in the estuary like the first guns of the old blitz...."

That the boys do not think it unethical to destroy this house is demonstrated in their otherwise ethical behavior:

  • They work seriously at their task.
  • When T. discovers bundles of pound notes stuffed in a mattress, Blackie asks if these will be shared, but T. replies, "We aren't thieves....Nobody's going to steal anything from this house. He has kept seventy for the boys to burn, "a celebration." 
  • One of the boys takes food and a blanket out to Mr. Thomas: "We don't want you to starve, Mr. Thomas."
Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What's ironic in Graham Greene's short story "The Destructors"?

The most obvious irony in "The Destructors" by Graham Greene concerns the leader of the Wormsley Common gang. At the beginning of the story, the leader is Blackie; however, when Trevor (who prefers to be called "T") takes over, the entire tenor of the gang and its activities changes, or at least intensifies.

One of the things the boys in the gang talk about doing concerns one of the most unusual sights in the poor neighborhood known as Wormsley Common. In the midst of the poverty and the post-war rubble, a two-hundred-year-old house is still standing, though it is clearly not as strong and unshakable as it once was. Its simple presence is remarkable enough, but the fact that it was built by the famous Christopher Wren, the country's (Britain's) most famous architect, sets this house apart. The boys have nicknamed the old man who lives "Old Misery."

Blackie and the boys always want to kind of "stick it" to the rich, and one of the things he and the gang want to do is sneak into Old Misery's house just to see if they can do it. He has no intentions of their stealing or destroying anything. When T suggests that they destroy the place instead, the boys have to be convinced; but eventually they are captivated by the idea, and that is when T takes over the gang.

Irony is a contrast between two things; in this case, the contrast is between what we expect and what happens. Fifteen-year-old Trevor is the son of an architect (albeit an out-of-work one), and we would therefore expect him to have the greatest appreciation for such a grand old structure--especially after he is allowed to see what an architectural wonder it is. Instead, he sees wants to destroy it. Even after he sees firsthand the magnificent stairway and the fine furnishings and finishes, he still wants to destroy it. This unexpected act from a boy who no doubt learned to appreciate fine architecture generally and Christopher Wren specifically is an example of dramatic irony.

A similar example happens during the gang's destruction of the house. For a young hooligan who has no qualms about participating in a gang and routinely committing illegal acts, T is curiously and surprisingly ethical about Old Misery's money. Blackie is the one who assumes the boys will all get a share of the money they find in the old man's mattress, but T mixes that idea promptly:

 “We aren’t thieves.... Nobody is going to steal anything from this house.” 

It is unexpected to hear such high-minded morality from a criminal who is about to burn money and destroy a man's house, in addition to the lesser crimes surrounding this act. How ironic for a gang member to claim that he is not a thief. No, he is not a thief, but he is a...fill in the blank however you wish. Whatever you say there, it is ironic.

Be sure to check out the excellent eNotes sites below for more analysis of Graham Green and his works.

See eNotes Ad-Free

Start your 48-hour free trial to get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Last Updated on