Themes and Meanings

Download PDF Print Page Citation Share Link

Last Updated on May 5, 2015, by eNotes Editorial. Word Count: 609

Design for Living was an immediate success on Broadway because it was brilliantly acted by Noël Coward (Leo), Alfred Lunt (Otto), and Lynn Fontanne (Gilda), but its subject matter caused both debate and distaste, while the Lord Chamberlain’s objections prevented its production in England until 1939. The triangular relationship of Gilda, Leo, and Otto, and Gilda’s rejection of marriage and of the stereotypical female role seemed to constitute an attack on social norms. In his introduction to the first volume of Play Parade (1933), Coward argued that he had produced not a general design for living but a design for the three witty, amoral, unconventional egotists who are his chief characters. Alien to any environment but their own, they are, like many of Coward’s more orthodox couples, happy neither together nor apart. Part of the thematic ambiguity arises from the play’s conclusion: The laughter with which it ends could be interpreted as lascivious anticipation, mockery of Ernest, or, as in act 1, hysteria. Coward said that he preferred to envision the trio as laughing at themselves.

Illustration of PDF document

Download Design for Living Study Guide

Subscribe Now

While many comments made by characters in the play support Coward’s claim that the design is only for those whose “lives are a different shape,” the demand that unconventional souls should be free to find the sexual modus vivendi that suits them, without being subject to moral judgments, challenged social conventions and societal norms. Thus the Lord Chamberlain, if he sniffed moral relativism in Design for Living, was almost certainly correct.

Other questions are raised in the play: the effect of success on the creative artist, his dual functions as creator and entrepreneur, and the leveling of artistic attainment by the pressure of public taste. Is living or creating the first priority for an artist? Is success a danger, a reward, or simply an aspect of change? These issues are dealt with perfunctorily. Many are raised only in the conversations which occur while characters are preparing for—or recovering from—changes in the emotional triangle.

Gilda, however, is central to the action, the bone fought over in every act. Her character is the most developed, and her self-discovery, in act 2, appears to be the focus of the play. Her attempt to find a fulfilling role in life is an important theme.

When she recognizes that she is...

(The entire section contains 609 words.)

Unlock This Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this Design for Living study guide. You'll get access to all of the Design for Living content, as well as access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

  • Themes
  • Characters
  • Critical Essays
  • Analysis
Start your 48-Hour Free Trial


Explore Study Guides