Summary

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Alexis de Tocqueville observed a world in political upheaval where ideas about governance proliferated. Born amid the aftermath of the French Revolution, he witnessed France's evolution into an empire and then a republic. With Democracy in America, Tocqueville sought to convey his admiration of the United States while pioneering a novel method of political analysis grounded in realism rather than abstract notions of rights.

Analyzing Social Institutions

Tocqueville diverged from thinkers like Rousseau by focusing on empirical data over hypothetical origins of society. He commenced his study with a comprehensive examination of America's geography, climate, native tribes, economic activities, and natural assets. This approach heralded a new scientific attitude towards the study of societal structures, laying the groundwork for modern sociopolitical analysis.

The Institution of Property

Central to Tocqueville's exploration was the institution of property division. Unlike European nations where primogeniture kept estates intact and within families, America displayed a dynamic property landscape. The constant redistribution of land and wealth fostered social mobility, differing starkly from the entrenched hierarchies of Europe. This fluidity opened avenues for individuals to pursue diverse careers, unencumbered by the limitations of hereditary privilege.

Equality and Political Structures

Tocqueville was captivated by the practice of equality, uncommon in his native France. He delved into political equality, becoming one of the earliest commentators on the democratic practices within U.S. townships and corporations. He believed that municipal government, particularly in New England, was pivotal to fostering a sense of freedom and responsibility among citizens. This system empowered voters, making legislative and executive bodies mere extensions of the public's will, a novel concept for 19th-century Europeans.

Democracy's Caveats

Despite his admiration, Tocqueville was mindful of democracy's potential pitfalls. He warned that when a single interest prevails over others, governance becomes tyrannical. Previously, this occurred when elites suppressed lower classes through military, feudal, financial, or religious domination. However, democracy's greatest threat, he contended, was a "tyranny of the majority," where minority rights might be sacrificed for majority rule, potentially descending into despotism and anarchy.

Insights into Comparative Politics

While Democracy in America focused on the U.S., it served as a comparative political study. Tocqueville stressed that the Old World, particularly France, must embrace democratic principles akin to those in the New World to achieve true independence. He foresaw the rise of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century, where power concentrated not just within a class but in a single party or leader. His prediction of two dominant 20th-century powers, Russia and the United States, highlighted contrasting motivations—Russian aggression versus American prosperity—foreshadowing a clash between servitude and freedom.

Second Volume's Cultural Insights

The second installment, released five years later, solidified Tocqueville's status as a leading political thinker. This volume shifted focus from foundational social and economic aspects to cultural dimensions of American life. Tocqueville examined the arts, rhetoric in Congress, scientific progress, the status of religious minorities, and public monuments' significance. He concluded that democracy, prioritizing utility over aesthetics, stifled the flourishing of the arts, with artists more akin to artisans producing transient commodities.

Balancing Standards and Governance

Despite these criticisms, Tocqueville acknowledged that democracy elevated certain standards while lowering others. He admired the republican sense and structure of government, noting democracies' peaceful predisposition due to personal wealth, property stakes, and a compassionate outlook. However, when embroiled in conflict, democratic societies demonstrate the same ambition that fuels their economic pursuits, often leading to military success.

Final Reflections on Governance and Equality

Tocqueville concluded Democracy in America by cautioning against despotism, even within republics. He conceded that democracies could be occasionally violent or unjust but believed such instances were rare and would increase if equality diminished. One of his poignant final images is of "a flock of timid and industrious animals," illustrating individuals forsaking personal freedom for a powerful centralized authority. He advocated for a balance between central and local governance and a sustained commitment to equality across all societal sectors.

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Next

Reference

Loading...