Student Question
Compare the protagonist's isolation in "Death by Landscape" and "To Room Nineteen."
Quick answer:
In "Death by Landscape" and "To Room Nineteen," both protagonists, Lois and Susan, experience isolation due to betrayal and existential doubts. Lois's isolation begins in childhood, tied to emotional events, while Susan's starts in adulthood, rooted in reason and infidelity. Lois's isolation is tied to unresolved childhood mysteries, whereas Susan's is linked to marital disillusionment. Lois finds solace in landscapes, believing Lucy lives on, whereas Susan succumbs to madness, ending in suicide.
The isolation of Lois and Susan compares in terms of betrayal being the cause; in terms of the doubts (e.g., about their children) and questions (e.g., whose fault) that are raised; in terms of inability to reconcile life aspects. The isolation of Lois and Susan contrasts more significantly and includes contrasts in age during events and at the beginning of isolation; in emotionalism and "intelligence"; in the roles of emotion and reason ("intelligence"); in the presence of despondency or absurdity in present life; and in the depth and effect of psychological instability.
Lois's and Susan's ages contrast during the stories narrative period. Lois's tragic story--while told as a frame story set at Lois's retirement from family life--occurs when she is young, telling of events between when she was nine and thirteen. Lucy comes to camp when Lois is ten and steps "sideways" to disappear when she is thirteen. Susan's story,...
Unlock
This Answer NowStart your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
told as a frame story retrospective ("This is the story ... about a failure in intelligence .... They were older when they married...") begins when she is in her late twenty's and ends when she is "fortyish." Lois'sisolation begins while she is a child, contrasting with Susan's isolation, which begins when she is a wife and mother.
The chronological structure of Lois's and Susan's stories
contrasts. Lois's story inside the frame is told in flashback,
which isolates her throughout the story because her adult
isolation is born in her childhood. This contrasts with
Susan's story, which, within the third-person retrospective frame, is told in
continuing chronological order. This dramatizes the beginning moments of
Susan's isolation, beginning with Matthew's first confession
of infidelity. Lois's isolation begins in the past and bleeds
into the present, while Susan's isolation begins in the
present and is carried into the future.
Lois's story and tragedy is founded in emotionalism in
contrast with Susan's story and tragedy being founded in
"intelligence," that is in reasoning, not feeling. Lois's emotion
isolates her because she is too overcome with weeping to
insist that Cappie understand the truth about the absence of anger in her last
moments with Lucy. Susan's intelligence isolates her because
she rejects and denies her emotions while questioning the truth and
meaningfulness of her love, her marriage and her children. One is
isolated because of emotionality, the other because of
intelligence, or reasoning.
Ironically, Lois is snagged into isolation by Lucy's and
Caddie's faulty reasoning, while Susan is snagged into
isolation by hers and Matthew's disruptive emotions. Lucy
reasoned that going back to Chicago would be bad and that it
was not dangerous to venture too near the cliff edge (suggesting her
disappearance was an accidental fall: "like a cry of surprise, cut off too
soon"), and Caddie reasoned that there had to be a
comprehensible cause that Lois could provide to Lucy's disappearance. Susan
couldn't accept the reasonableness of or cope with her erupting
emotions, and Matthew couldn't contain his lustful
emotions.
Lois is isolated because she feel despondence in her present
life ("present" since she was thirteen). Contrastingly, Susan
is isolated because she experiences the turmoil of the "absurd" in her present
life (present, extending into her future). Lois and Susan
compare because both feel further isolation
because both question the reality of their children's births. The adult Lois of
the frame says that she "can hardly remember, now, having her two boys in the
hospital, nursing them as babies," and Susan feels that "her children were not
her own."
Both women further compare because both are unable to
reconcile aspects of their lives. Although they fail to reconcile different
aspects, they compare in that Lois is unable to reconcile the
mystery of the landscapes ("something, or someone, looking back out"), while
Susan is unable to reconcile the meaning of Matthew's actions (are they
meaningful or absurd?).
Lois and Susan contrast in the depths of their
isolation because Lois felt Lucy lived on ("She is here. She
is entirely alive."), while contrastingly Susan felt her life
to be a desert. In comparison, both women have the same
unanswered question prying at the corners of their minds: Who is at fault? In
comparison, both women are betrayed by a loved one.
Contrastingly, Lois is betrayed by Lucy, whether through
foolhardiness or despair, and Susan is betrayed by Matthew through his fits of
adultery. Â
Lois contrasts with Susan in that Lois suffers from the
isolating, unremitting distraction of her tragedy and the
projection of hope onto empty reality in landscape paintings, but Susan falls
into the isolation of choking insanity, with the devil
stranger tracking her and "the reflection of the madwoman" and her "meaningless
tinkling laughter." In further contrast, Lois's
isolation ends with Lucy alive with her, but Susan's
isolation ends with tightly closed windows, a turned valve and
escaping gas in a closed, isolated, room.