Historical Context
Political Turmoil
During the turbulent years of Lucretius' lifetime, spanning from 94 B.C. to 55
B.C., the city of Rome was engulfed in a storm of political unrest, a fierce
battle for supremacy. In 88 B.C., a brutal civil war broke out, pitting the
aristocratic force of Lucius Cornelius Sulla against the populist warriors led
by Gaius Marius. As Marius advanced upon Rome, he unleashed a wrathful campaign
of vengeance against the ruling elite, his hands stained with the blood of
unrestrained massacres. By the time Lucretius reached his teenage years, Sulla
had asserted his dominance over Rome, assuming the role of dictator and
exacting ruthless retribution on his former adversaries.
Amidst this chaos, Lucretius witnessed the erosion of the longstanding republican government, a familiar albeit unstable system, which shielded the populace from the unpredictable and oppressive grip of military rule. As the republic crumbled, Roman loyalty shifted away from the state, towards charismatic military leaders and influential political figures. Concurrently, the traditional Roman allegiance to family and state weakened, and doubts began to surface regarding the mythology that had long shaped their spiritual beliefs. This combination of factors sparked a transformative period of cultural uncertainty.
The Power Struggle of the Triumvirate
The relentless quest for dominance between Pompey, Crassus, and Julius Caesar unfolded throughout much of Lucretius' youth. Despite forming a triumvirate—a strategic alliance to further each leader's ambitions—their coalition was marred by power abuse and internal discord, eventually leading to its downfall. Shortly after Lucretius' demise, Crassus' death triggered a direct confrontation between Pompey and Caesar. By 52 B.C., the Senate had appointed Pompey as sole consul in a bid to outmaneuver Caesar. In 49 B.C., Caesar made his triumphant return to Rome, swiftly seizing control over the entirety of Italy. Lucretius' passing occurred before Caesar could instill a sense of stability in the realm.
The Influence of Epicureanism
Many scholars assert that the extreme political turbulence of Lucretius' era explains his dedication to Epicureanism. Confronted by constant warfare and discord, he embraced Epicureanism as a philosophy of peace, pleasure, and moral integrity. His graphic portrayals of warfare in De rerum natura undoubtedly reflect the volatile political landscape he inhabited. Furthermore, Lucretius esteemed the Epicurean emphasis on friendship; having witnessed the horrific violence of power struggles, it is no surprise that he championed the ideal of fostering bonds and aiding one another.
Religious and Philosophical Crossroads
Lucretius lived in an era where educated Romans began to waver in their faith,
questioning the intricate mythologies that underpinned their religious
convictions. Doubts arose over the gods' and goddesses' involvement in every
facet of life, from romantic affairs to the triviality of mildew. The lack of a
discernible link between natural events—volcanic eruptions, earthquakes,
rainfall—and divine worship posed a dilemma. Nonetheless, Romans continued to
maintain religious institutions, honor the gods, and dedicate games to them. As
skepticism towards the complex mythology of Roman deities grew, it may have
paved the way for the later practice of deifying emperors, which not only
personified Roman gods but also countered the burgeoning influence of popular
cults.
Lucretius and the Epicurean Perspective
In the realm of philosophy, Lucretius stood apart as an adherent of Epicureanism, a philosophy at odds with the prevailing doctrines of Aristotle and Plato. Though they offered distinct worldviews, Aristotle and Plato were the celebrated thinkers of the time, disagreeing on pivotal questions, such as the universe's origins. Plato posited that the cosmos was crafted by a divine "Craftsman," while Aristotle maintained that the universe was eternal, having no beginning. Despite their differences, both philosophers agreed on the uniqueness of Earth and...
(This entire section contains 742 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
the intentional design of the world, which stood in contrast to Lucretius' beliefs.
Lucretius asserted in De rerum natura that the universe was neither created by gods nor intended for humanity. In Book Five, he boldly claimed, "I'd dare assert / And prove that not for us and not by gods / Was this world made. / There's too much wrong with it!" His declaration directly challenged the notion of a divinely orchestrated world.
The Rising Stoic Influence
As Lucretius penned his works, the teachings of Aristotle and Plato gained traction among the intellectual elite of Greece, setting the stage for the Stoic philosophy's ascendancy in Rome. The Stoics endorsed the idea of an orderly world, aligning with the cosmological perspective of both Plato and Aristotle. This philosophical climate positioned Lucretius in direct opposition to the prevailing ideas of his time.
Literary Style
Epic FeaturesDe rerum natura defies the traditional mold of an epic in fascinating ways. It steps away from the grandiose settings, the dashing heroes, and the divine adulation typically expected. Yet, its language soars with elegance and poetry. Lucretius crafts analogies and metaphors as his tools, painting vivid pictures to express his concepts. Although he frequently nods to the philosophies of others, his references are typically to challenge and overturn their ideas rather than to join in their ranks, diverging from the pattern of most epics.
Audience
While Lucretius professes that Memmius is his intended audience—the dedicatee
of the epic—the true readers are those ensnared by the fear of divine forces
and death. Essentially, it is his contemporaries and future generations whom he
seeks to address. His mission was to illuminate the minds of his readers,
liberating them from a shadowy existence burdened by unnecessary fear.
Didactic and Methodical Approach
Lucretius embraces a precise and systematic style to convey his scientific
perspectives, mirroring his philosophical stance. He unravels the mysteries of
physics with clarity and order, akin to a teacher guiding students through an
enlightening lesson. Each point he establishes serves as a foundation upon
which subsequent discussions build. The poem is didactic, aiming to educate
rather than stir emotions or provoke deep contemplation. Throughout, Lucretius
asserts truths with the confidence of an authority. An example from Book Two
declares, "Apply your mind now, hear the truth of reason!" Firm in his
expertise, he dismisses dissenters, as seen in Book Four: "Lend me your subtle
attention and keen mind, / And don't shout 'That can't be!' at what I say ..."
In Book Five, he critiques contrary theories, writing, "This farfetched
nonsense reason must reject."
Analogies
Lucretius deftly employs analogies to demystify complex scientific ideas,
making them digestible for a broad audience. He compares his scientific
insights to bitter wormwood, sweetened on the rim of a glass like honey to
entice children. In Book Three, illustrating the concept of the soul's
insubstantial atoms, he argues that the soul's intangibility doesn't negate its
existence. He draws upon examples like chalk that cannot be felt upon the skin,
fog that is imperceptible to touch, and a cobweb landing unnoticed—a testament
to the unseen yet existent.
Repetition
Much like his use of analogies, Lucretius employs repetition to engrain his
teachings into the reader's memory. He tirelessly reiterates that nature
follows immutable cycles, a fact he deems crucial for his audience to grasp,
weaving this theme throughout his work. Similarly, he underscores the futility
of living in fear, seizing every chance to drive this point home with
unwavering emphasis.
Compare and Contrast
Ancient Insights into Atoms
First century B.C.: In Lucretius' poetic masterpiece De rerum natura, he unveils a world woven together by atoms—those unseen, unbreakable seeds of all that exists.
The Rise of Experimental Science
Sixteenth and seventeenth centuries: As the winds of change sweep through the corridors of science, atomic theory begins to blossom. Pioneering chemists reveal the secrets of matter by dissecting its components. Water, for instance, is unraveled into its elemental dance of hydrogen and oxygen.
The Microscope Revolution
1930s: With the birth of the electron microscope, a new era dawns—one where scientists peer into the minuscule realm of the atom, unveiling its secrets like never before.
Beliefs in Ancient Rome
First century B.C. Rome: In a world where myths and deities intertwine with daily life, Romans hold fast to the belief that celestial beings orchestrate natural phenomena and human fate. To win their divine favor, people erect altars and offer sacrifices, hoping to sway the gods and goddesses.
Religious Landscape in the Twentieth Century
Twentieth-century United States: Data collected in 1996 by the United States Census reveals a tapestry of belief: 56% of Americans embrace Protestantism, 25% adhere to Roman Catholicism, while 11% are without religious affiliation. These figures paint a picture of a nation where the belief in a singular god predominates.
Political Landscapes
First century B.C.: Rome stands at a crossroads under the shadow of a shaky republican government.
1789: A pivotal moment in history, as the United States enshrines its Constitution, forging a lasting foundation for its democratic republic—a cornerstone that endures to this day.
Bibliography and Further Reading
Sources
Esolen, Anthony M., "Introduction" in De rerum natura: De rerum
natura, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.
Fitzgerald, William, "Lucretius' Cure for Love in the 'De rerum natura,'" in The Classical World, Vol. 78, No. 2, 1984, pp. 73-86.
Penwill, J. L., "The Ending of Sense: Death as Closure in Lucretius Book Six," in Ramus—Critical Studies in Greek and Roman Literature, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1996, pp. 146-65.
Segal, Charles, "Poetic Immortality and the Fear of Death: The Second Proem of the 'De rerum natura,'" in Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, Vol. 92, 1989, pp. 193-212.
Stein, Gordon, Review in Free Inquiry, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1996, p. 571.
Further Reading
Grant, Michael, Greek and Latin Authors, 800 B.C.-A.D. 1000: A Biographical
Dictionary, H. W. Wilson, 1979. Provides profiles of 376 early Greek and
Latin authors.
O'Hara, James J., "Venus or the Muse as 'Ally,'" in Classical Philology, Vol. 93, No. 1, 1998, pp. 69-76. Explores the influence of the Greek poet Simonides on Lucretius' De rerum natura.
Summers, Kirk, "Lucretius and the Epicurean Tradition of Piety," in Classical Philology, Vol. 90, No. 1, January, 1995, pp. 32-58. Lucretius' religious stance, central to his great epic, differs from that of his master Epicurus.
Thomas, Edmund J., and Eugene Miller, Writers and Philosophers, Greenwood Publishing Group, 1990. Offers information on 123 writers who are frequently anthologized, and explains their literary influence. Also, seventy-five philosophers are profiled with brief explanations of their teachings.
