On the one hand, a modern defender of women's rights who read Defoe's essay would regard it as a reflection of traditional understandings of gender. Defoe clearly believes that women are primarily suited to be helpmeets to men. As he writes near the end of the essay,
[I]n short, I would have men take women for companions, and educate them to be fit for it. A woman of sense and breeding will scorn as much to encroach upon the prerogative of man, as a man of sense will scorn to oppress the weakness of the woman.
Clearly, the notion that women are meant to be companions to men and that their education and "breeding," as Defoe calls it, should prepare them for that, is outdated. Indeed, many advocates for women's rights would argue that the persistence of this attitude is at the heart of the struggle for women's equality today.
Unlock
This Answer NowStart your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
Clearly, the notion that women are meant to be companions to men and that their education and "breeding," as Defoe calls it, should prepare them for that, is outdated. Indeed, many advocates for women's rights would argue that the persistence of this attitude is at the heart of the struggle for women's equality today.
At the same time, reading the document in context, Defoe makes a number of arguments that were, for their time, progressive, and in that sense a modern supporter of women's rights might read him as a sort of kindred spirit, although one far removed in time and ideology. He dismisses those who regard women as intellectually inferior, arguing that, if they are, it is their education that has made them that way, not anything inherent to their sex:
The soul is placed in the body like a rough diamond; and must be polished, or the lustre of it will never appear. And ’tis manifest, that as the rational soul distinguishes us from brutes; so education carries on the distinction, and makes some less brutish than others.
Indeed, at some points in the essay, Defoe posits that women may have more intellectual potential than men:
The capacities of women are supposed to be greater, and their senses quicker than those of the men; and what they might be capable of being bred to, is plain from some instances of female wit, which this age is not without. Which upbraids us with Injustice, and looks as if we denied women the advantages of education, for fear they should vie with the men in their improvements.
The implications of this argument are that much about gender is not inherent, but rather constructed and shaped by society. This is fundamental to the modern understandings of gender that are basic to arguments for women's rights. So some parts of Defoe, read in context, are advancing a fairly sophisticated and progressive view of gender roles and education. Many modern advocates of women's rights might recognize these in his essay.
References