Discussion Topic

Putnam and Proctor's argument in The Crucible and its implications

Summary:

In The Crucible, Putnam and Proctor's argument highlights the tension between personal grievances and the larger hysteria of the witch trials. Putnam's greed for land and Proctor's integrity clash, reflecting the broader conflicts within the community. This argument underscores how personal vendettas fuel the chaos, demonstrating the dangerous intersection of private interests and public hysteria.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

In Act 1 of The Crucible, what do Proctor and Putnam argue about and what does it reveal?

In act one, John Proctor challenges Thomas Putnam when he demands that Reverend Parris consult Reverend Hale from Beverly to search for witches in their community. Proctor tells Putnam that they vote by name and not acreage, which prompts Putnam to criticize John about his poor Sunday service attendance record. Proctor then proceeds to criticize Parris's preaching, and Putnam accuses John of participating in a faction dedicated to ousting Reverend Parris. As Proctor is leaving the scene, he instructs Giles Corey to help him drag some lumber home, and Putnam immediately accuses him of stealing the lumber from his tract of land. According to Thomas Putnam, the tract of land belonged to his grandfather, which is something Proctor disputes. Thomas Putnam's obsession with land foreshadows his decision to use the witch trials as a land grab by having his daughter falsely accuse innocent citizens of witchcraft, which allows him to...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

buy their forfeited land. Thomas Putnam's arguments with John Proctor also establish him as anantagonist who aligns himself with Salem's corrupt authority figures.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Why do Putnam and Proctor argue in The Crucible?

At first, Mr. Putnam and John Proctor argue about how dire the situation with the girls in Salem is. Proctor takes issue with the fact that Reverend Parris didn't consult anyone else in the village before he called for Reverend Hale, the witch hunter from Beverly. Putnam, however, has a sick daughter, and he says, "There be children dyin' in the village, Mister!"  And Proctor replies, "I see none dyin'. This society will not be a bag to swing around your head, Mr. Putnam." In other words, Putnam accuses Proctor of not taking the situation seriously enough, and Proctor accuses Putnam of trying to manipulate the village. 

Then, Putnam instructs Reverend Parris to tell Mr. Hale to look for witches when he arrives, and Proctor declares that Putnam cannot "command" the minister. Proctor again accuses Putnam of trying to rule. Putnam accuses Proctor of not caring about society since he hasn't been "at Sabbath meeting since snow flew," and Proctor blames his absence on the subject of Parris's sermons: "only hellfire and bloody damnation." Why would he want to come each Sunday to listen to the same negative sermon again and again?

Next, Putnam takes Parris's side when Parris accuses Proctor of being part of a faction to remove Parris from his position.  Putnam declares that this faction moves against Parris "and all authority," to which Proctor declares that he'd like to find this party and join it. 

Finally, Putnam and Proctor quarrel over land. Proctor mentions his intention to take some lumber home, and Putnam accuses him of removing lumber from his land. Proctor declares that he bought the land from Francis Nurse some years ago, Putnam declares that his grandfather willed the land to him, and Proctor accuses his grandfather of giving away land that didn't belong to him (a claim that Giles Corey supports). In short, Putnam and Proctor fight about anything and everything.  

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

In The Crucible, what do Putnam and Proctor argue about and what could it foreshadow?

Mr. Putnam is convinced that there are witches in Salem, and he wants Reverend Parris to make an announcement to this effect and deal with the situation openly and publicly. Proctor, however, points out that Putnam is making claims for which there is no evidence: there are no children dying in the village, just a couple little girls who are acting strangely.

Further, Proctor fears that Putnam is simply attempting to manipulate the town for his own benefit. He says, "This society will not be a bag to swing around your head, Mr. Putnam." Then, when Mr. Putnam tells Reverend Parris that he must proceed to investigate any potential signs of witchcraft when Reverend Hale arrives, Proctor says, "You cannot command Mr. Parris. We vote by name in this society, not by acreage."

Proctor knows very well what kind of person Mr. Putnam is, and he sees how Putnam is attempting to direct the actions of the town when really, many more people ought to have some say in how to proceed or even if it is necessary at this point. This is significant because it shows us how much ill will exists between these two men, as well as the fact that Proctor will stand up to people when he sees some wrong or injustice taking place. This could potentially foreshadow his later arrest for witchcraft when he tries to do precisely the same thing in court.

Approved by eNotes Editorial