Critics who view The Counterlife positively regard it as a quintessential display of Roth's artistic talent. He vividly captures the intricacies of his scenes and the actions within them. The dialogue aligns seamlessly with the complexities of the overarching theme, and every chapter highlights the dilemmas and decisions faced by the characters. Most importantly, supporters of The Counterlife argue that Roth's portrayal of Henry/Sherman Zuckerman, along with the variations of his character, showcases the author's skill in infusing deep intellectual exploration into his storytelling. The Roth fictional world is not solely defined by eroticism.

Conversely, Roth's critics argue that Henry/Sherman Zuckerman exemplifies Roth's failure to concentrate on and fully develop a singular, cohesive character. Instead, Zuckerman transitions from one role and decision to another, undermining his own authenticity and realism. According to the negative critique of The Counterlife, while Roth provides plenty of enjoyment, satire, and even entertainment, ultimately, his characters merely strive to escape from their identities.

1. In the Zuckerman novels, particularly, Roth seems aware of his own craftsmanship and Jewish identity. Is this quality evident in The Counterlife? If so, where?

2. Is Henry Zuckerman an autonomous character, or is he a fictional creation of his brother Nathan? Can one argue that Nathan assumes a Jacob-like role, taking Henry's birthright and reducing him to a mere figment of his imagination?

3. What role does Mordecai Lippman play in this novel? Do he and his impact on Henry Zuckerman signify more than just another facet of Roth's recurring themes related to Jewish identity? Is Lippman a fully developed character with depth and complexity?

4. What contributions do seemingly minor characters like Carol Zuckerman, Maria Freshfield's mother and sister (Sarah), Henry Zuckerman's children, and the journalist Shuki Elchanan make to the novel and the dynamic between Henry and Nathan Zuckerman?

5. Why does Roth compel readers to repeatedly consider characters and situations in various contexts? Do these exercises in re-evaluation affect the novel's cohesiveness?

6. A beta-blocker plays a significant role in treating Henry Zuckerman's heart condition but simultaneously causes impotence, significantly impacting his sex life. How does this contradiction connect to one or more of the novel's themes? Could the beta-blocker be seen as a major symbol in the novel, or does it relate to the title in any way?