"Confession" and "The New Birth" Summary
The book contains two articles and an introduction to each by the editor. The two articles are considered to be among the most important contributions made by Menno Simons, a Dutch priest and subsequently an Anabaptist preacher and an important figure in the Reformation. “Confession” was written to explain Menno’s decision to leave the Catholic priesthood and to counter accusations that he was part of the extreme radical arm of the Reformation exemplified by the Anabaptist group that captured and held the German city of Münster from 1534 to 1535. “The New Birth” was written to explain the behavior that should characterize a follower of Christ and to challenge the established religious leaders with regard to their behavior.
In “Confession,” Menno described his service as a Catholic priest, starting in 1524. Early in his Catholic career, it troubled him that the bread and wine used in the Communion service did not appear to change into the flesh and blood of Jesus. The Catholic Church’s doctrine of transubstantiation argued that such a change took place. He tried to allay his doubts but could not escape them no matter how much he prayed. As a result, he was inspired to study the New Testament, in which he found no basis for the literal transformation.
When Menno heard that an Anabaptist was beheaded for being baptized as an adult, he studied the New Testament with regard to baptism. The word Anabaptist means “baptized again or rebaptised” and was coined to describe a loose group of Reformation activists who believed the Bible taught that baptism should come after a person had declared his or her belief in Christ, not as an infant before that decision could be made. Infant baptism was the policy and theology of the Catholic Church, and most infants were baptized. Therefore, baptism as an adult was generally a second baptism and was held to be a capital offense. Menno’s study led him to agree with the Anabaptists.
As Menno searched the New Testament for information on these questions, he was also bothered by his life as a priest. He found it too comfortable and too loose morally. The Bible seemed to teach that followers of Christ should live a much more meaningful life of sacrifice, service, and moral uprightness. He explored the thoughts of Martin Luther and other leaders of the Reformation on these and other questions, and after struggling with them for some time, he began teaching his convictions while continuing to serve as a priest. Later, in 1536, about twelve years after he began his New Testament studies, he abandoned his position as a Catholic priest.
Menno used the “Confession” to refute the accusation that he was allied with the Münster Anabaptists. In 1534, an Anabaptist group took control of the German city of Münster and ruled it for about a year. Münster was freed from the Anabaptists’ control in 1535, but the policies and actions of the group while controlling the city gave all Anabaptists a bad name. They embraced a number of questionable practices, including the community of goods (in which individuals turned everything they owned over to the group, for use by the group), polygamy, and violence, often killing their opponents. In refuting the accusation, Menno describes his many arguments against the Münster Anabaptists. He also outlines the events leading to his association with the Anabaptists as follows. Shortly after he left the priesthood, members of a group not associated with Münster in any way asked him to take a leadership role with them. After considerable discussion, prayer, and meditation, he agreed and was ordained as an Anabaptist preacher, probably in late 1536.
In the final part of the “Confession,” he describes his life as an Anabaptist preacher, including the lack of resources and prestige, and the danger of persecution and death because of his beliefs. He spent much of his Anabaptist life hiding from authorities. Still, he declares his primary concern to be the...
(The entire section is 978 words.)