Compromising Positions

by Susan Isaacs

Start Free Trial

Literary Techniques

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

As an intricate web of mystery, Compromising Positions deftly maneuvers through the realms of a traditional detective narrative while simultaneously offering a light-hearted parody. At its core, the tale spins around the burning question: "Who eliminated Bruce Fleckstein, the Long Island periodontist whose lavish lifestyle was secretly fueled by blackmail and illicit photographs?" This central mystery serves a dual purpose—either as a gripping narrative for those focused on the plot or as a comedic journey for readers pausing to savor the novel's clever jabs at the genre. The title itself, alluding to the scandalous "compromising positions" of Fleckstein's photographed lovers, not only underscores the novel's humorous undertone but also hints at the ethical crossroad faced by its protagonist.

Through weaving together a dual narrative—the detective search and the heroine's personal journey towards self-discovery—Isaacs skillfully sidesteps the pitfall of creating a superficial page-turner. Her infusion of abundant humor allows her to tackle weighty themes without descending into sentimentality or preachiness. Ultimately, Isaacs demonstrates that any story can oscillate between the realms of seriousness and comedy, all depending on the perspectives of the writer, the narrator, or the reader.

Social Concerns

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

In her debut novel, Isaacs weaves a tapestry of themes that resonate deeply with the narratives of many contemporary women writers. Chief among these is the powerful exploration of female independence and the journey to self-discovery. At the heart of the story is Judith Singer, a vibrant and sharp-minded woman who once aspired to earn a Ph.D. in American politics but set aside those dreams upon marrying. A decade down the road, she finds herself ensnared in the ennui of a Long Island housewife's life. Her involvement in unraveling a murder mystery within her community sets the stage for confrontation with her husband. As the story unfolds, he emerges less as a domineering figure and more as a man wrestling with his wife's pursuit of personal fulfillment. The murder investigation becomes not only a metaphor for Judith’s quest for autonomy but also the thrilling mechanism driving her transformation.

Isaacs does not shy away from delving into other quintessential "women's" themes, such as the right to sexual satisfaction, the significance of friendships, particularly among women, and the dual nature of motherhood—its delights and its constraints. Regarding motherhood, Isaacs deftly sidesteps portraying it as a snare. Indeed, having penned numerous articles for Parents magazine, Isaacs is portrayed as a staunch advocate for full-time motherhood until her children are grown. She paints the suburban mother's daily life with rich, vivid strokes—from the routines of shopping and meal preparation to moments of play and conversation with children, always mindful of fostering a nonsexist upbringing. Despite highlighting positive aspects, Isaacs is keen to assert that women, even in motherhood, need adult dialogue and interests to avoid regressing into childlike states themselves. As Judith delves deeper into her detective pursuits, her husband fears she threatens their children's safety. Yet, what truly hangs in the balance is his idyllic world, where his wife maintains the home, allowing him to escape to the office and return to an oasis of reassurance and ego bolstering. As these two spheres collide, he must begin to shoulder parenting as a shared duty, and, more unsettling, recognize his wife as an equal partner making independent choices.

Compromising Positions also serves as a comedic critique of the American Dream as embodied by suburban life and the traditional nuclear family with a single breadwinner. Isaacs deftly illustrates that ambition and monetary security are mere husks without self-fulfillment. She captures the essence of the Yuppie generation's quandary: financial stability and familial obligations have failed to...

(This entire section contains 534 words.)

Unlock this Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

quench the longing for the carefree spirit of bygone days. Political conservatism hasn't completely extinguished the flame of liberal idealism. As the children of the '60s come of age, they grapple with lingering doubts about the worth of their success and fear that their youthful visions have been compromised. As Judith peels back the veneer of her pristine suburban enclave, uncovering the grim truths hidden beneath, she confronts her own past complacency. Within the "perfect" wife and mother lies a person with profound needs and aspirations unmet by her current existence. Though the future remains uncertain, Judith's newfound ability to make choices as a self-reliant adult fills her with hope, even if it means risking her commitments to others.

Literary Precedents

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Compromising Positions brilliantly showcases an author's ability to weave together the seemingly disparate threads of detective fiction and the Bildungsroman, or coming-of-age novel. Isaacs, with her pen, conjures comparisons to the legendary Chandler, and her central character is hailed as a seasoned Nancy Drew, even earning the moniker "Sam Spade in pantyhose." She's a concoction of three parts Bloomingdales, one part de Beauvoir. Isaacs' genre choice is indeed astute. Notably, the eminent Dorothy Sayers observed the scarcity of female detectives in the professional sphere, yet the amateur sleuths hold a revered spot. From Christie's astute Miss Marple and the adventurous Tuppence Berensford to Josephine Tey's insightful Miss Pym, and Amanda Cross's contemporary Kate Fansler, these women delve into mysteries driven by their profound interest in and knack for understanding human nature. They often sidestep the "technical" details of cases, focusing instead on unraveling the psychological tapestry of individuals, echoing the French tradition of detective storytelling. Despite their lack of formal credentials, their unconventional approaches often lead to more gratifying outcomes than those achieved by their professional male counterparts.

In the realm of contemporary women's literature, the "quest for identity" novel stands firmly established. Perhaps initiated by Doris Lessing's "Martha Quest" series, this genre embraces writers like Erica Jong with her provocative Fear of Flying (1973), Marilyn French's groundbreaking The Women's Room (1977), and Rita Mae Brown's audacious Rubyfruit Jungle (1973), among others. The protagonists of these narratives navigate the intellectual waves of modern feminism, with one critic noting an "occasionally strident note of knee-jerk feminism" in Compromising Positions. These fictional women, amidst the complexities of contemporary femininity, offer intriguing and distinctive resolutions to their quests for self-discovery.

Adaptations

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Compromising Positions found new life on the silver screen in 1985, under the banner of Warner Brothers and the visionary direction of Frank Perry. The screenplay, crafted by Susan Isaacs herself, managed to distill the essence of her intricate novel into a dynamic and comedic detective adventure. A stellar cast brought the story to life, with Susan Sarandon captivating audiences as the lead, accompanied by Edward Herrmann as her on-screen husband, and Raul Julia embodying the astute detective. The ensemble was rounded out by the talented Judith Ivey, Deborah Rush, Mary Beth Hurt, and Anne De Salvo, who each delivered compelling performances in their supporting roles.

The film was met with critical acclaim, earning laudatory reviews that celebrated its wit and energy. The Screening Committee of the National Board of Review, renowned for their discerning taste, deemed the film "extraordinary," cementing its status as a standout cinematic achievement of its time.

Previous

Characters

Next

Teaching Guide

Loading...