Literary Techniques
As an intricate web of mystery, Compromising Positions deftly maneuvers through the realms of a traditional detective narrative while simultaneously offering a light-hearted parody. At its core, the tale spins around the burning question: "Who eliminated Bruce Fleckstein, the Long Island periodontist whose lavish lifestyle was secretly fueled by blackmail and illicit photographs?" This central mystery serves a dual purpose—either as a gripping narrative for those focused on the plot or as a comedic journey for readers pausing to savor the novel's clever jabs at the genre. The title itself, alluding to the scandalous "compromising positions" of Fleckstein's photographed lovers, not only underscores the novel's humorous undertone but also hints at the ethical crossroad faced by its protagonist.
Through weaving together a dual narrative—the detective search and the heroine's personal journey towards self-discovery—Isaacs skillfully sidesteps the pitfall of creating a superficial page-turner. Her infusion of abundant humor allows her to tackle weighty themes without descending into sentimentality or preachiness. Ultimately, Isaacs demonstrates that any story can oscillate between the realms of seriousness and comedy, all depending on the perspectives of the writer, the narrator, or the reader.
Literary Precedents
Compromising Positions brilliantly showcases an author's ability to weave together the seemingly disparate threads of detective fiction and the Bildungsroman, or coming-of-age novel. Isaacs, with her pen, conjures comparisons to the legendary Chandler, and her central character is hailed as a seasoned Nancy Drew, even earning the moniker "Sam Spade in pantyhose." She's a concoction of three parts Bloomingdales, one part de Beauvoir. Isaacs' genre choice is indeed astute. Notably, the eminent Dorothy Sayers observed the scarcity of female detectives in the professional sphere, yet the amateur sleuths hold a revered spot. From Christie's astute Miss Marple and the adventurous Tuppence Berensford to Josephine Tey's insightful Miss Pym, and Amanda Cross's contemporary Kate Fansler, these women delve into mysteries driven by their profound interest in and knack for understanding human nature. They often sidestep the "technical" details of cases, focusing instead on unraveling the psychological tapestry of individuals, echoing the French tradition of detective storytelling. Despite their lack of formal credentials, their unconventional approaches often lead to more gratifying outcomes than those achieved by their professional male counterparts.
In the realm of contemporary women's literature, the "quest for identity" novel stands firmly established. Perhaps initiated by Doris Lessing's "Martha Quest" series, this genre embraces writers like Erica Jong with her provocative Fear of Flying (1973), Marilyn French's groundbreaking The Women's Room (1977), and Rita Mae Brown's audacious Rubyfruit Jungle (1973), among others. The protagonists of these narratives navigate the intellectual waves of modern feminism, with one critic noting an "occasionally strident note of knee-jerk feminism" in Compromising Positions. These fictional women, amidst the complexities of contemporary femininity, offer intriguing and distinctive resolutions to their quests for self-discovery.
Adaptations
Compromising Positions found new life on the silver screen in 1985, under the banner of Warner Brothers and the visionary direction of Frank Perry. The screenplay, crafted by Susan Isaacs herself, managed to distill the essence of her intricate novel into a dynamic and comedic detective adventure. A stellar cast brought the story to life, with Susan Sarandon captivating audiences as the lead, accompanied by Edward Herrmann as her on-screen husband, and Raul Julia embodying the astute detective. The ensemble was rounded out by the talented Judith Ivey, Deborah Rush, Mary Beth Hurt, and Anne De Salvo, who each delivered compelling performances in their supporting roles.
The film was met with critical acclaim, earning laudatory reviews that celebrated its wit and energy. The Screening Committee of the National Board of Review, renowned for their discerning taste, deemed the film "extraordinary," cementing its status as a standout cinematic achievement of its time.