Discussion Topic
Arguments and Impact of Thomas Paine's Common Sense on American Independence
Summary:
Thomas Paine's Common Sense argued for American independence by emphasizing the absurdity of a distant island ruling a continent, critiquing monarchy, and advocating for a republic. Its clear, persuasive language galvanized public opinion, making the case for breaking away from British rule accessible to ordinary colonists, thereby significantly contributing to the momentum for independence.
What are three arguments Thomas Paine made in Common Sense?
The Revolutionary War (1775-1783) had already begun when Thomas Paine's fifty-page pamphlet, Common Sense, appeared in January 1776.
Common Sense was published anonymously because of its treasonous content. After its publication, the meaning and purpose of the conflict changed. Before its publication, the war was largely about unfair taxation. After the appearance of Common Sense, independence was the Americans' goal. Common Sense was a best-seller and George Washington noted its significance. Washington said,"Common Sense is working a powerful change in the minds of men."
Common Sense blamed King George III for the war. Before Common Sense, most colonists had held the British Parliament culpable for the escalating struggle. According to Paine, the Crown had abused the colonists and only independence would rectify the situation.
Several arguments for independence were put forth in the pamphlet. One argument made was that tiny England should not rule over a vast continent....
Unlock
This Answer NowStart your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
Another was that a declaration of independence was necessary to secure foreign support for the war. (Foreign support, particularly that provided by France, would be instrumental in the colonists' eventual victory.) And finally, Paine called for the creation of a democratic republic.
Common Sense gave impetus to the Declaration of Independence in July 1776.
One of Thomas Paine's arguments in Common Sense was that when ordinary people help to create their government, it will produce a better system than the British one. He gave the example of a group of people in a "sequestered part of the earth, unconnected with the rest." Paine explained that these people would unify and then find the need to create laws to rule their land. Their government would start out small. As the population increased, they would have to elect citizens to represent them. Paine suggested that elected officials must frequently meet with their electors. He contrasted this idea with the British system.
Second, Paine expressed his thoughts that the American colonies have evolved and no longer require British rule. He argued against the idea that the colonists should be loyal to England because it had protected the them and defended them at their own expense. He states that they "would have defended Turkey from the same motive," which was to protect "trade and dominion."
Third, Paine condemned the attacks of the British army on the colonists. He drew several comparisons to a country attacking its own people, stating that "even brutes do not devour their young." He describes England as full of tyranny.
What five arguments does Paine use in Common Sense to advocate for America's independence?
In Common Sense Paine's principal arguments for independence stem from two basic ideas, in my view. The first involves the English constitution and the system of government of Great Britain. The second is that the American colonies simply no longer need to be connected with Britain. We can examine these ideas, and you can then extrapolate five (or more) specific conclusions Paine reaches as to why the independence of the colonies is necessary.
Paine debunks the claim that the different components of the British government act as checks upon one another. The fact that the monarchical part (the King) still exists is evidence to Paine that the constitution of England is "sickly." In his Rights of Man, written fifteen years after Common Sense, Paine even goes so far as to deny that England, or Great Britain as a whole, has a constitutional system at all. In Paine's view hereditary succession has no place in government, and monarchs are worthless:
Of more worth is one honest man to society and in the sight of God, than all the crowned ruffians that ever lived.
But even if the English system were ideal, Paine refutes the notion that America needs Britain or that there should be any connection at all with the "mother country." This is partly because, according to Paine, Britain's protection of America is due only to self-interest, and because Britain, in the French and Indian War—and at any time—
did not protect us from our enemies on our account, but from her enemies on her own account.
Furthermore, Paine considers the concept of England as the "parent country" of America to be false:
Europe, and not England, is the parent country of America. This new world hath been the asylum of the persecuted lovers of civil and religious liberty from every part of Europe.
This argument is especially interesting because it indicates that America, in 1776, was already a "melting pot," a haven for people from any country, not just England or Britain.
It is also true, says Paine, that since the beginning of hostilities between Britain and America—which, as he wrote Common Sense in February of 1776, had already been taking place for ten months, since April, 1775—all the previous arguments for remaining connected with Britain have been invalidated. "Every quiet method for peace," writes Paine, "hath been ineffectual." Paine enumerates the reasons that, in his view, even if "matters were now made up [i.e., hostilities were brought to an end]," the result would be "the ruin of the continent."
Apart from these specific points asserting that reconciliation is impossible and that America should not be governed by Britain in any event, toward the close of Common Sense Paine elaborates his first point about the British system of government being defective:
The republics of Europe are all (and we may say always) in peace. Holland and Switzerland are without wars, foreign or domestic: Monarchical governments, it is true, are never long at rest; the crown itself is a temptation to enterprising ruffians at home; and that degree of pride and insolence ever attendant on regal authority, swells into a rupture with foreign powers, in instances, where a republican government, by being formed on more natural principles, would negotiate the mistake.
In other words, America should be an independent republic, for its own benefit. To read Common Sense today is to see how influential and prescient Paine was, nearly half a year before the Declaration of Independence was written.
What arguments did Thomas Paine make in Common Sense and what was their impact on the colonists?
Early in his essay, Thomas Paine makes explicit his purpose in writing Common Sense.
To examine that connexion and dependance, on the principles of nature and common sense, to see what we have to trust to, if separated, and what we are to expect, if dependant.
In other words, Paine sets out to argue the benefits of independence if the American colonies were to separate from Britain and outline the detrimental nature of the relationship were it to continue as the status quo.
Using logic, concession, refutation and both deductive and inductive reasoning as well as appeals to emotion, Paine skillfully argues that it doesn't make sense for a small island empire (Great Britain) to rule over a vast continent located across the Atlantic Ocean. He avers that independence would allow the colonies to trade freely with any other nations, not just the ones that Great Britain allows. He also makes the point that an independent America would no longer be dragged into Great Britain's wars with others.
Aside from Loyalists who preferred to remain with Great Britain for their own reasons of political appointment, lack of faith in an independent government, fear of military annihilation, or other reasons, Common Sense was a sensation in the American colonies, outselling any other publication in the colonies per capita. It was widely read in public gatherings and created an audience for Paine's later pamphlets collected as The American Crisis.