Themes: Individual Conscience and Action

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Throughout “Civil Disobedience,” Henry David Thoreau expresses his strong concern with the weight of individual conscience. This is an especially important matter because of the ways in which it connects with each person’s civic responsibilities and decisions about their relationship with the government. Through rhetorical questions, Thoreau suggests that conscience is what decides right and wrong behaviors and that people should resist any “rule of expediency.” He apparently criticizes individual decisions by which any person to any degree would “resign his conscience to the legislator”; otherwise, he cannot see the point of having a conscience. He is convinced that there is a difference between the law and what is right, and the latter is more crucial to him:

The only obligation which I have a right to assume, is to do at any time what I think right.

Each individual must assume a position within society—which Thoreau refers to as “a corporation”—in accordance with their most deeply held beliefs. The group as a whole does not have a conscience and can only act as though it has one because of the shared beliefs and perspectives of its members: “a corporation of conscientious men is a corporation with a conscience.” The individuals therefore impart their conscience to the group, which Thoreau strongly advocates, regardless of personal cost.

This line of questioning and criticism is closely connected to Thoreau’s views on the military and men’s participation in it. The very definition of humanity is at stake for him. He is alarmed by men who set aside their own conscience—as well as common sense—in order to obey “some unscrupulous man” who holds the power. The beings who simply follow along, exhibiting no doubts about the “damnable business” of war, challenge his very conception of humanity:

Now, what are they? Men at all?

This existential question leads Thoreau into a consideration of the kinds of decisions that men must make according to their conscience. He speculates about the conditions that require people to evaluate whether a law is just or not and considers how to best behave according to that evaluation.

Expert Q&A

Why was Thoreau jailed and what were his feelings about the government in "Civil Disobedience"?

Thoreau was jailed for refusing to pay a poll tax, protesting against the Mexican War and slavery. In "Civil Disobedience," he criticizes the government for overreach and corruption, believing it manipulates the masses and operates like a machine. Thoreau argues that individuals must challenge unjust laws and not blindly serve the state, showcasing civil disobedience as a moral duty.

What is Thoreau implying about men serving the state in this passage from "Civil Disobedience"?

"The mass of men serve the state thus, not as men mainly, but as machines, with their bodies. In most cases there is no free exercise whatever of the judgment or of the moral sense; but they put themselves on a level with wood."

Thoreau implies that most men serve the state as unthinking machines, without exercising moral judgment, akin to lifeless objects like wood. He criticizes this blind obedience to government directives, using the example of soldiers in the Mexican-American War. Thoreau believes true "men" are those few who think independently and resist governmental actions when they are unjust, engaging in civil disobedience to uphold moral principles.

What is Thoreau's opinion of the voting populace?

Thoreau views the voting populace with disdain, equating voting to gambling and seeing it as an ineffective way to bring about change. He argues that merely voting is a passive act, expressing weak desires without taking real action. Thoreau believes true change requires direct, individual effort rather than relying on government or the majority's decisions, as outlined in his works like Civil Disobedience and "Slavery in Massachusetts."

What is Thoreau's meaning in "Civil Disobedience" when he discusses government, majorities, conscience, and the citizen's relation to the legislator?

"Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience?—in which majorities decide only those questions to which the rule of expediency is applicable? Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator?"

Thoreau, in "Civil Disobedience," critiques majority rule, arguing that conscience should guide decisions on right and wrong, not just expediency. He questions whether citizens should submit their conscience to legislators, suggesting that a government should rule through conscience rather than majority. Thoreau believes majority rule often neglects minority voices and supports injustices like slavery, urging a government based on ethical principles rather than mere majority opinion.

What does Thoreau mean by "Let your life be the counter-friction to stop the machine"?

Thoreau means that individuals should act according to their conscience to resist unjust government actions, effectively becoming the "counter-friction" to halt the government's harmful practices. He argues that governments, like machines, often perpetuate injustice, and it is the duty of morally-minded individuals to practice civil disobedience to prompt change, even if it means facing consequences like imprisonment.

Why does Thoreau believe the best government is one that "gets out of its own way"?

Thoreau argues that the best government is one that "gets out of its own way" by minimizing interference and aligning closely with the people's will. He believes governments inherently become corrupt and disconnected from the populace they serve. Echoing Jefferson, Thoreau asserts that minimal governance allows individuals to achieve more, as exemplified by American progress despite governmental obstacles. He cites the Mexican War as an instance where government acted against public consent, manipulated by a few individuals.

What does Thoreau mean by "expedient" in the context of government in "Civil Disobedience"?

"Government is at best, but an expedient."

In "Civil Disobedience," Thoreau uses "expedient" to describe government as a means to an end, but often ineffective or harmful. He argues that governments should serve specific purposes without overreaching, as overreach can lead to negative consequences. Thoreau criticizes government for prioritizing convenience over justice, often failing to serve individuals adequately.

What does this quote mean: "Yet this government never of itself furthered any enterprise, but by the alacrity with which it got out of its way. It does not keep the country free. It does not settle the West. It does not educate"?

The quote from Thoreau's "Civil Disobedience" criticizes government inefficiency, suggesting that it often hinders progress more than it helps. Thoreau argues that government involvement does not advance education, commerce, or westward expansion, asserting that less interference would empower citizens to achieve more. He views government as an unnecessary obstacle rather than a facilitator of freedom and progress, emphasizing individual action over governmental control. Thoreau's ideas influenced figures like Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr.

What point does Thoreau make by discussing his shoes and leading a huckleberry party upon his release?

Thoreau's discussion of his shoes and leading a huckleberry party after his release from jail highlights his view of the experience as an ordinary part of his week, not a significant or life-changing event. Living near Walden Pond, his arrest for not paying a poll tax was a minor interruption, resolved when his aunt paid the tax. However, the incident later inspired Thoreau to write about civil disobedience, which gained symbolic significance over time.

What does Thoreau criticize about majority rule and what obligation does he assume in "Civil Disobedience"?

Thoreau criticizes majority rule for prioritizing numbers over morality, arguing that it does not necessarily lead to justice. He believes that majority rule is based on might rather than right, which can endanger individual rights. In "Civil Disobedience," Thoreau asserts the obligation to follow one's conscience over the law, as laws can be unjust. He emphasizes that individuals should act according to what they believe is right, not merely what is legal or supported by the majority.

Show another question (30 questions hidden)

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Previous

Themes: All Themes

Next

Themes: Just and Unjust Laws

Loading...