Historical Context
In the serene summer of July 1846, Henry David Thoreau found himself behind bars in Concord, Massachusetts, not for any heinous crime, but for failing to pay his taxes. This act of defiance was not about the money itself but rather a protest against the government policies he deemed unjust, specifically those extending slavery through the Mexican-American War. His brief incarceration ended the next day when someone, likely his aunt, paid the bill. Yet, this modest episode catalyzed a significant ideological movement. In 1848, Thoreau articulated his motivations in a lecture at the Concord Lyceum, which was later published as “Resistance to Civil Government” in 1849. This treatise, now widely known as “Civil Disobedience,” laid the groundwork for nonviolent resistance movements across the globe.
"Civil Disobedience" is more than a historical document; it is a manifesto advocating the moral imperative to resist unjust laws, particularly those perpetuating slavery. Thoreau’s words resonated across continents and decades, profoundly influencing leaders like Mohandas Gandhi in India’s quest for independence from British rule and Martin Luther King Jr. during the American Civil Rights movement. Even during the turbulent period of the Vietnam War, Thoreau’s thoughts served as a beacon for those advocating for peace and justice.
Thoreau diverged from the societal norms of his time, seeking identity not through communal ties but through individualism. He believed that true moral authority comes from personal conscience, not the dictates of the majority or government edicts. For Thoreau, every individual’s duty was to heed their conscience's call, especially when it countered the prevailing laws or public sentiment. He argued that a just government should permit individuals to follow their moral compass without hindrance.
Thoreau’s philosophy held that when a government enforces unjust laws, individuals should withdraw their support immediately, irrespective of the consequences or public opinion. This withdrawal could manifest as refusing to pay taxes or abstaining from military service. Thoreau acknowledged that such actions might lead to punishment, including imprisonment, but he viewed these penalties as minor compared to the profound spiritual freedom gained by adhering to one's conscience. To him, those who comply with unjust laws or engage in wars they oppose become less human, transforming into mere cogs in a societal machine.
Expert Q&A
What impact does Thoreau argue government has on society in "Civil Disobedience"?
Why does Henry David Thoreau call for a revolution?
Henry David Thoreau calls for a revolution in "Civil Disobedience" to protest the U.S. government's support of slavery and the unjust war with Mexico. He uses the metaphor of a "machine" to describe the government's role in oppression and robbery, arguing that when a nation claiming to be a refuge of liberty enslaves people and invades foreign lands, it is time for honest men to rebel and seek change.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.