Editor's Choice

List and describe the major factors that influenced the evolution of management thought.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The way managers think used to be governed by a very industrialized way of thinking, known as "Taylorism."

Taylorism takes a scientific approach to workers, training them to do a specific job efficiently and to be efficient parts of a production chain. This worked particularly well in a factory environment, before a lot of the jobs previously done by people were taken over by machines.

The field of management and this way of thinking has had to evolve dramatically in recent years due to the modernization of work practices, the influence of technology, the emergence of the internet, and the rights of workers needing to be respected in unprecedented ways.

In a world in which every company is faced with unprecedented levels of competition, managers have had to learn to think quicker, act faster, and react more strategically in order to stay in business.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

This is an important question and there are many factors that influence the evolution of management thought. I will list a number of them.

First, management is partially about trial and error. So, management tries something and if it does not work, then they move on and try something else. They continue to do this, until they have an idea that works well.

Second, management changes at times due to the changing circumstances. As you know, we live in a very volatile world. Things can change in an instant. A good management team knows this and even sees it coming. For example, Apple computer changed their model quite a bit. They started with computers and now they are in the TV world, music world, and phone world.

Third, a good management team also knows that the the market is now global. So, they will evolve as they broaden their horizons to an international market.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What factors led to the evolution of management theories?

The Industrial Revolution

During the industrial revolution, the manufacturing sector was the main driver of economic growth in Western countries. In a bid to improve efficiency and boost production, manufacturers adopted the scientific management theory. The workers were assigned duty stations. There were supervisors to manage the junior factory workers and make sure that they did what they were supposed to do.

Later on, the neoclassical theory was adopted as a result of inefficiencies in the classical theory of management. Manufacturers discovered that high pay was not the only way to motivate workers. There was also a need to improve the overall working environment.


The availability of information and ease of communication has also influenced how companies practice management. Modern management theories emphasize the importance of data and the adoption of innovation to achieve company objectives.

Scholarly Research

Another notable factor that has contributed to changes in management theory is different schools of thought. Over the years, renowned scholars and managers have come up with their theories of management.

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What factors have influenced the revolution/evolution of management theory?

A factor in early modern management theory was the Scientific Approach of Frederick Winslow Taylor, which focused on ways to scientifically increase efficiency by focusing on job design. Taylor linked employee motivation and productivity to efficiency through appropriate job design. Henri Fayol's Administrative Approach and Max Weber's Bureaucratic Approach were responses to and subdivisions of Taylor's scientific efficiency approach: all three sought to improve job efficiency to increase work productivity.

In the 1920's Elton Mayo of Harvard University introduced the Human Relations Approach, which was supported by the Hawthorne Studies. This step of evolution in management theory was indeed a small revolution because for the first time since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution the human factor was recognized as critical to productivity. Compare this to Taylor's earlier focus on job design, which expressed the idea that humans may work the job design, but the design is what relates to productivity, not the humans.

Mayo's Human Relations Approach was bolstered by Abraham Maslow's 1943 psychological theory of human needs hierarchy, and it became generally recognized that social needs were being met through work and personal productivity. This step in the evolution of management theory further revolutionized management because the Industrial Revolution idea that workers were expendable units of production was replaced by the scientific precept that human relations were not only critical to productivity but were fulfilled through productivity.

The idea of the interconnectedness between human relations, human psychology and job productivity continued to be explored in the Human Relations Approach as behaviorist theory was applied by McGregor through reward/punishment theories: Theory X defining workers by their need for punishing threats to initiate motivation and Theory Y defining workers by their need for approval and reward to initiate motivation. The application of behaviorist reward/punishment in the evolution of management theory presented another revolutionary moment in that workers were again defined as dehumanized units whose interaction with their work was dependent upon external stimuli rather than dependent upon their inner natures and qualities.

The Systems Approach, introduced by biologist Ludwig von Bertalanffy, attempted to meld into a balance the two oppositional theories of a scientific approach to productivity and a human-focused approach. As a biologist, he focused on the entire environment and the effect of the entirety upon productivity. He examined the interconnected relationships between employees and productivity in the environment of customers, company management and output. Bertalanffy's ideas again revolutionized how people thought about management by including the entire complex company structure in considerations of employee productivity.

The next evolution in management theory produced another revolution in thought when Contingency Theory proposed that productivity depended not only on the company system, as in Bertalanffy's Systems Approach, but also upon the continually evolving external environment within which the company was situated. Contingency Theory of the 1960s emphasized that all management situations were affected by multiple internal and external factors, including economic conditions, government policy, employee relationships and advances in technology. Management of companies could succeed only if contingencies for each of the various changeable factors were provided.

It's important to note that the evolution of these theories, as can be seen by their descriptions, follows the evolution of complexity in the modern business world. As business became more complex because of the development of advanced technologies and an increase in population and an increase in income and standard of living (in developed nations), management theory became more complex because of attempts to define and describe more complex management and companies, a process that reciprocally affected the developing complexity of companies and management.

Chaos Theory of the 1980s, influenced by chaos theory in physics, revolutionized the evolution of management theory by stating that, even with contingencies accounted for and prepared for, business systems could exist in environments that were undirected and unpredictable. By recognizing the inherent nature of chaos manifested in any large (or any sized) group, managers could enable efficiency and productivity by allowing a natural flow--for example, the formation of groups and of communication and leadership styles--to operate within the organization, while managers continued motivating the organization to fulfilling of the company's objectives. 

As a side note, in regards to the wording of your question, which originally asked for just the "revolution" of management theory, it is more likely that what you want is the "evolution" of--the progressive development of--management theory. As it happens, major steps in the evolution (progression) of management theory have in fact introduced revolutionary changes in thought, behavior and the understanding of human nature. Consequently, it was possible to point out both "evolution" and "revolution" in one discussion.

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What are the factors that led to the evolution of management?

The first major factor in the evolution of business management was the growth in the size and complexity of organizations following the industrial revolution. Although imperial administration in places such as Persia, China, the Roman Empire, and even the Papal chanceries could be considered important precursors to the development of management, modern management, with its emphasis on efficiency, was really a product of manufacturing as an industry. Another major factor was the rise of capitalism, which made the bottom line increasingly important.

Modern management began in the early twentieth century with the effort to codify and apply scientific tools to the problem of productivity. This was symbiotic with increasing automation of various processes and the development of the assembly line. An important figure in this process was Frederick Winslow Taylor, who innovated in the area of time and motion studies.

An increase in the power of computers allowed managers greater visibility and more accurate information on which to base improvements in productivity. The twenty-first-century improvements in technology have allowed increasing use of big data and fine-grained use of algorithms as part of the management toolbox.

See eNotes Ad-Free

Start your 48-hour free trial to get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Last Updated on