Brown, John

Start Free Trial

Student Question

How did John Brown's ideas contrast with those of the court?

Quick answer:

John Brown's ideas contrasted with the court's as he saw his actions to free slaves as morally justified, whereas the court viewed them as criminal. Brown argued that saving wealthy individuals would have made him a hero, highlighting a moral double standard. Despite this, he praised the court for a fair trial and expressed pride in his sacrifice, hoping it would contribute to ending slavery.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Brown admitted that he had a "design to free slaves," but, contrary to the court's decision, he argued that there was nothing wrong with this. He said that if he had intervened to preserve the lives of the wealthy or the powerful, instead of slaves, he would have been considered a hero rather than a criminal. But he ultimately praised the court and the trial, which he considered as fair under the circumstances. And he claimed that he was honored to have his blood "mingle" with that of slaves, expressing the hope that his actions would help bring about the end of slavery. 

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Approved by eNotes Editorial